View Full Version : Smoothstepper

16-08-2009, 11:20 PM
Have been looking at the smoothstepper product and the features it offers look very very useful.

I have read about people having problems with continuity of connection back to pc and other issues. Also at the moment it seems like it is a product that isn't very well supported and doesn't seem to be moving forward, hence I'm very hesitant about making a purchase.

Anyone on here have any experience with it or know anything contrary to the above??



John S
16-08-2009, 11:31 PM
I have one of the first beta release boards and the later connector board from Arturo Duncan at CNC4PC although the firmware is that latest version.

It was bought to go on a lathe to try and sort the threading problem out in Mach.

However the smooth stepper hasn't been finished and Greg has left the building.

The encoder support hasn't been implemented and there are a few other issues, backlash etc.

However for me it's the fact that for no reason it looses connection with the PC occasionally and can't find out why.

If it's for a mill or router I can't see, other than USB connection what advantage it has over the parallel port. As I said I wanted this for a lathe but like the Gecko G100, the NC Pod, the Smooth stepper and the Brain, none have come to fruition.

I sometimes feel I'm more of a beta tester for Barclay's withdrawals than CNC firmware [ sigh ]

17-08-2009, 05:11 PM
Thanks for the reply John, you've confirmed what I was thinking and what I had read. It is a shame as it looked very promising.

My main interest was the extra i/o it gives without adding extra parallel ports simplifying the interface to the pc.

It's also a shame about some of the other products, although I get the impression that people either make a fast buck or they just can't handle the business side of things.



17-08-2009, 06:13 PM
Hi Sparks
If itís additional I/O youíre after you may like to take a look at PoKeys USB key board emulator. WWW.poscope.com It provides digital I/O, 5 analog inputs (10-bit) and 1 analog output (10-bit). All the I/O are controlled by the provided software which allows either to use the graphical user interface or advanced console type interface. The settings can be stored on the device, so no special software is needed on target system.
There is also a Mach3 plug-in. The UK distributor is www.paltronix.com

17-08-2009, 11:44 PM
If you look on youtube you will find someone from the mach forum's lathe which uses a smoothstepper. Hood I think his name is. He seems most impressed with it, I mailed him on youtube and asked about it, I gather he couldn't get decent rapids without one.
I wanted to try a cnc brain but the bloke over here who has one running tells me the only person with a properly working setup with one is Bruce and he doesn't infact use USB but something home made and much more robust. But I gather work is ongoing and the motion control is being completly rewritten from scratch.

I will probably be trying a SmoothStepper on my Matsuura. can you run
with 12000 counts per rev and a parrallel port?

John S
18-08-2009, 12:18 AM
can you run
with 12000 counts per rev and a parallel port?

No and you can't with a Smooth stepper, try 1 count per rev,
They are setup for encoders but so far it only supports a single index pulse just like the PP.
Multi line hasn't been implemented yet.

I'm interested in one for threading on lathe, there is a problem with Mach using the PP, when threading if you thread is short, say less than 40mm the problem doesn't show.

Do a long thread and it gets out of pitch, the problem lies in the core of Mach which is still Art's baby. We have done many, many hours of testing even staying on the phone to Art for literally hours but the problem is still there.

The SS 'should' take care of this as it works real time, as you have said Hood has no problems but Hoods machines isn't the best one to beta test problems, he reckons he gets a good thread from a PP but seeing as he has something like a 12 HP motor driving a mechanical gearbox it's bound to remain stable when threading.

We mortals OTOH are trying to get hobby bench top lathes working with far smaller power facilities.

I'd love to keep my SS working long enough to do some serious test but for some reason it won't. The last 3 emails over 2 months to Greg have gone unanswered. There is a limit we can go, last month I lost 10 hours in testing various configurations, none of it chargeable.