Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
  1. #1
    Hi,

    I have previously had designs on building a cnc, but various stuff cropped up & diverted me, so they never got past the design stage.
    I'm hoping to re-boot with a smaller, simpler design that i have been researching for quite a few months.

    I am immediately breaking the rules as over the years I have collected various mechanical components and I have designed a machine around what I have “in stock”
    I know is the wrong way to do it, but that's just the way it is with this one, cos i'm too tight to chuck owt away!

    I want to build a Fixed Gantry, Moving Table Cnc. The working area will be constrained (by the parts i have) to 350 x 350mm x 200mm(Z).
    Mainly for cutting Aluminium, but also wood & composites such as fibreglass.

    Parts & Materials I already have :
    6x 20mm Misumi linear rails 580mm long
    3x 16mm, 5mm pitch NSK ballscrews with a travel of 350mm
    6mtr 200 x 75 steel C-Section
    The C-Section is parallel flange and is sturdy stuff (6mm thick with 12mm thick sides)which weighs in at about 23kg /mtr
    I realise box section is better & stiffer, but i got 6 metres of this stuff super cheap ages ago & i'm sick of falling over it!

    Here are some basic renders of the initial design done with my first steps in fusion 360 (which is a great program)
    I have not gone into great detail in the cad as I don't think it's worth rendering every last detail, just the general outlines. The cad is excellent for finding interference parts & testing movement etc.

    Construction of the frame will be tack welding, then lots of drilling & bolting, with brackets where needed. I only have basic hand tools & a drill press, and very little mechanical experience.
    The orange plates are 10 or 12mm ground steel gauge plate & the white parts Aluminium tooling plate. The red indicates the cutting area.

    The Ballscrews are 5mm pitch so I'm planning on ditching the motor mounts & using belts & pulleys to gear 1:2 on X&Y , at the moment I have Z at 1:1
    Motors will probably be 3 or 4Nm Nema23 and AM882 drives
    2.2kw Chinese water cooled spindle & VFD.

    I'm planning to do Axis alignment on the Y plate using epoxy putty & location pins. Then bolting.

    Any comments, criticism, suggestions or ideas gratefully accepted.
    Cheers.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Plain_Channel.jpg 
Views:	77 
Size:	25.2 KB 
ID:	21155   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	rails and bs.jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	437.5 KB 
ID:	21156   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4.jpg 
Views:	100 
Size:	123.8 KB 
ID:	21157   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6.jpg 
Views:	76 
Size:	82.1 KB 
ID:	21158   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5.jpg 
Views:	72 
Size:	116.7 KB 
ID:	21159   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3.jpg 
Views:	61 
Size:	115.6 KB 
ID:	21160   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.jpg 
Views:	67 
Size:	104.2 KB 
ID:	21161   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.jpg 
Views:	63 
Size:	79.9 KB 
ID:	21162   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7.png 
Views:	62 
Size:	142.0 KB 
ID:	21163  

  2. #2
    Hi Greeny,

    Looks good and should do what you want it to.

    Yes, box would be stiffer but I think this will be plenty good enough as it is. I guess you could plate over the back of the C-section that runs across the top between the two sides if you have a bit of plate spare.

    Also the Y axis will be limited in stiffness by the small L bracket which holds the AC bearing block - I would reinforce this or look at a stiffer way to mount it.
    Building a CNC machine to make a better one since 2010 . . .
    MK1 (1st photo), MK2, MK3, MK4

  3. #3
    Hi routercnc, Thanks for your input.

    I wiil look in to adding some braces as you suggest. Easy to do and extra strength is always welcome.

    Great point on the bearing block brackets, i will look in to beefing them up.

    Cheers

  4. #4
    Looks around to see if Jazz is waiting to pounce

    Coast looks clear, time to make a radical suggestion

    If the linear blocks on the Y and Z axes did not line up with each other or with the router itself, then with a bit of jiggery pokery the Y and Z rails could almost touch, the router could sink into the plate behind it, the overhang greatly reduce and the X axis bearings could move even closer to the gantry thereby stiffening the whole assembly

    It is a matter of thinking in 3D.

    This message will self destruct in 10 seconds. Don't tell him it was me

  5. #5
    Hi Robin,
    Don't worry your secret is safe with me

    I think i understand the intention of what you are suggesting and like the idea, but not exactly sure on the details.
    Could you explain a little further?

    Cheers
    Last edited by Greeny; 19-03-2017 at 01:45 PM.

  6. #6
    Right now you are simply stacking layer on layer and moving the router further and further away from the gantry, ignoring the fact that overhangs are not your friend. This is the peril of designing a 3d object on a 2d sheet.
    .
    The Y and Z linear blocks could be sunk in to the plate until the rails hit the plate. Less overhang. If they didn't line up with each other then extra metal could be bolted on behind to compensate for the loss. The clever bit would be removing still more metal below the blocks so you approach the limit which is where the rails rub against each other.
    .
    I am all in favour of pushing the limits of the design rather than slavishly following what everyone else has done in the past. I am not building a router so some might say I should keep my fat mouth shut, feel free to tell me where to stick this stuff.
    .
    Your base is overhanging the X axis bearing blocks presumably to hold the X axis screw. All you have to support is a straight push pull, you seem to have a lot of excess metal thereabouts

  7. #7
    Ah I think I see now.
    I will have to think about that. I can see the benefits, but it complicates construction quite a bit and i'm very limited on skill, experience & tools! Will ponder if i'm brave enough

    Good point on the base, i will take a look at that and see what i can do.

    I appreciate your input, & most certainly won't tell you where to shove anything
    I also fully agree with your attitude of thinking "outside the box" or "racing your own whippet" as we say up here

    Cheers

  8. #8
    A half way to Robin's suggestion to reduce the overhang would be to place the Z screw outside the blocks so the risers (in red on "A") can be removed.

    This would reduce the overhang by 30mm, but widen the Y plate by 75mm to accommodate the screw. Although some weight could be saved by having a cut out as in drawing C1
    However the risers also serve to stiffen both Y & Z plates, so i'm not sure.

    I would be interested to know anyones thoughts on this (or any other part)

    Cheers

    Note: The orange X & Y plates are 10mm steel guage plate it would be easy to up them to 12 if i removed the risers, only adding 4mm to overhang
    Drawing B & C are the same just different angles.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	YZ test v2 A.png 
Views:	50 
Size:	187.2 KB 
ID:	21169   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	YZ test v3 B.jpg 
Views:	45 
Size:	99.8 KB 
ID:	21170   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	YZ test v2 C.jpg 
Views:	42 
Size:	81.6 KB 
ID:	21171   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	YZ test v2 C1.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	98.8 KB 
ID:	21176  
    Last edited by Greeny; 19-03-2017 at 04:03 PM. Reason: added stuff

  9. #9
    Sinking the rail blocks into the plates i think i could reduce overhang by about 16mm (8mm + 8mm)

    I don't think i can reduce it further as the rails are fixed to the 2 outside orange plates and move with respect to the center plate.
    If i sank the blocks any deeper the rails would interfere with the centre orange plate.
    They move over the whole length of the centre plate so, if i went any deeper, i would have to put a groove in the whole length of centre plate weakening it.

    Basically i'm saying the orange plates must be at least a rail height apart, so i could only sink them about 8mm each.
    Or have i misunderstood?

    Cheers
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	block sink 1.jpg 
Views:	50 
Size:	58.3 KB 
ID:	21173   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	blonk sink 2.jpg 
Views:	53 
Size:	52.6 KB 
ID:	21174  
    Last edited by Greeny; 19-03-2017 at 03:45 PM.

  10. #10
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	clearance.png 
Views:	65 
Size:	13.1 KB 
ID:	21177

    If you can't do it, you can't do it. Picture shows it is possible. The white arrow points to a 1mm clearance between the X axis linear rail in purple and the 8mm linear Z axis shaft in yellow

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Fixed z axis to gantry design
    By Lachlan in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 20-10-2015, 09:50 PM
  2. "Hacking" and "Modding"
    By magicniner in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 07-01-2015, 08:59 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-11-2014, 09:14 AM
  4. Setting up "System 45" 3 axis unit by DIYCNC
    By StevenT in forum LinuxCNC/EMC
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 15-10-2014, 03:22 PM
  5. "Racks" VS "ball screw"
    By C.AlveSilva in forum Linear & Rotary Motion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17-04-2012, 11:53 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •