. .
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by Clive S View Post
    Well then I think that the steps per are wrong on the drives
    I set them using the "Set steps per unit" feature, under the settings tab. It's like they're X10.
    My driver are set to 1/8 (1600 pluse/Rev) .
    I am using Tr8*8-2p (4 starts). And nema 23 @ 1.8°

  2. #22
    The co-ord stuff and scaling is sometimes iffy.
    Mostly, it is not wrong, necessarily.

    If the machine was set up with a certain abs. position, homed, then you use a different offset g54xx, it is unclear which units should be used.

    Since the work co-ords are not tied to a scalar, how is the sw to know what is/was the correct offset base in global terms.
    If a work co-ord is offset say 10,0 mm, and I switch to imperial, should the offset base adjust by /25.4. Why ?

    Likewise, should the machine global values adjust, or not ?
    Why ?

    If the home switch in z is offset 10.000- mm in z, metric, and I switch to imperial, should the home-pos value adjust ?
    If I read in the value into a parameter say #3000, should that number adjust ?
    Why ?

    I am NOT saying it is right, logical, correct.
    What I am pointing out is that it is very complex with no clear right answers, mostly.

    The UCxxx, and the chinese offline controllers, are mostly much less complex and donīt support a lot of the features in gcode.

  3. #23
    Good call Clive!
    I rarely think of the basic machine set up being at fault! :D
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to magicniner For This Useful Post:


  5. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by magicniner View Post
    Good call Clive!
    I rarely think of the basic machine set up being at fault! :D
    I got it figured out! It was an extra decimal point. i.e step per was set 2000.xxx instead of 200.xxx
    I guess, I assumed the step per start at 1600 and goes up.

    Appreciate your help, everyone!

    Now the step per is resolved, I need help to figure out why everything except square, rectangle, and straight lines come up deformed.

    The shapes below were supposed to be 20mm circle, and 20x20x20mm triangle.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screenshot_20190202-152212_Gallery.jpg 
Views:	163 
Size:	525.5 KB 
ID:	25408
    Last edited by CnCAbc; 02-02-2019 at 10:25 PM.

  6. #25
    Now the step per is resolved, I need help to figure out why everything except square, rectangle, and straight lines come up deformed.
    Could be missing steps ie. acceleration too high or voltage to the steppers too low. Or even excessive backlash. Or couplings loose on the motors.

    Glad you got the steps per right now.
    Last edited by Clive S; 02-02-2019 at 11:05 PM.
    ..Clive
    The more you know, The better you know, How little you know

  7. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Clive S View Post
    Could be missing steps ie. acceleration too high or voltage to the steppers too low. Or even excessive backlash. Or couplings loose on the motors.

    Glad you got the steps per right now.
    How to sort them out?
    The only things I'm sure is not the issue, are the voltage to steppers and coupling, the seems/feel tight/fine.

  8. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by CnCAbc View Post
    How to sort them out?
    The only things I'm sure is not the issue, are the voltage to steppers and coupling, the seems/feel tight/fine.
    Well you was sure the steps were fine before. Post a pic. of the machine also what drives and what is the voltage supplying them. What is the acceleration settings in Mach.

    Have you measured if the actual distance is the same for X100 and Y100

    We don't have crystal balls to see these things.
    ..Clive
    The more you know, The better you know, How little you know

  9. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Clive S View Post
    We don't have crystal balls to see these things.
    Yours in the shop for repair too? ;-)
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to magicniner For This Useful Post:


  11. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by magicniner View Post
    Yours in the shop for repair too? ;-)
    NO mine are in the pawn shop
    ..Clive
    The more you know, The better you know, How little you know

  12. #30
    I give you this one! I will double check everything and post pictures by tomorrow.

    Don't tell me the crystal ball I recently purchased from the pawn shop was yours? lol

    Thanks for taking the time to help!

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Weird Mach3 + CSMIO/IP-M Probe Problem
    By matt-b2 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-07-2019, 01:05 PM
  2. The best CAD/CAM suggestion, Gcode and Mach3
    By petes in forum CAD & CAM Software
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 29-01-2015, 11:06 AM
  3. Help needed for a 3d part gcode for mach3
    By Rebekah_harper in forum Computer Software
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 04-11-2013, 01:55 AM
  4. Mach3 Using a physical button to repeat current gcode
    By RLKS Rob in forum Artsoft Mach (3 & 4)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-08-2012, 01:30 PM
  5. Day shift Manual Miller/Night Shift Turner and Grinder Required - Berkshire
    By J Maynard in forum Opportunities Available & Sought
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 06-01-2012, 11:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •