Thread: Isolation Routing PCBs
-
09-07-2019 #1
This was my yesterday project ---
and I briefly mentioned it in another thread.
Doddy - I cut the PCB with a 1mm single flute mill to drill the holes and clear the bulk of the copper, then tidied up the tracks with an engraving cutter, DOC 0.2mm.
The circuit was designed by an adaptation of one I found on t'Interweb. It is a logic indicator (Hi-Lo-Pulse) which used a 4001 quad NOR gate. I rejigged it to use a 4011 quad NAND gate as I could find some of those (I have probably also got a tube of 4001's somewhere in my entropy driven storage area).
The circuit was drawn up using Circuit Wizard (which is old and has a very basic component library) and that produced the circuit board and output Gerber and Drilling files.
I then used CopperCAM to build a dxf from the Gerbers and then I put the dxf through the CAM process to give Gcode.
This was all a small run as I want to do a larger board for my next(ish) project, but I will be starting with KiCAD for the circuit design.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to cropwell For This Useful Post:
-
09-07-2019 #2
Technical question here -
Is an "Entropy Driven Storage Are" a big pile of stuff? :DYou think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D
-
09-07-2019 #3
-
09-07-2019 #4
"Entropy Driven Storage Area". Sounds like my brain. Though there are occasions when "It is a shitheap, mainly on the floor" fits as well!
I've been successfully using the toner transfer method for PCBs for some years. I prefer surface mount components myself (easier than drilling all those exactly spaced holes) where the spacing between tracks can be only 0.6mm for SOIC chips. Have you any experience of cutting PCBs for SMD components? I'd be interested to see how the two methods compare.
KitAn optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.
-
09-07-2019 #5
I avoid SMD, I am not into that sort of thing.
Now that I am in my 70's my dexterity isn't good enough for placing and soldering SMD's.
In my younger days, before I had a CNC machine, I tried various etch mask methods with variable success. In fact I have probably still got the letraset type PCB transfer symbols in a file somewhere, but I doubt if they will stick now, they hardly did when they were fresh.
-
16-07-2019 #6
Nice work. Personally I don't remove the unneeded copper and prefer to create earth plane. It means less milling work. I also use a miniature table saw for cutting the PCB to reduce the CNC work even more. Previously I used Eagle but then my son didn't like Eagle because it is far too complicated to use if you are a newbie, so he found EasyEDA when he wanted to make some PCB artwork, and after having tried it out about a year or two ago I got stuck to that one. It's web based, so I can access it anywhere I am, very fast, fairly easy to use and to create your own parts, as well as to generate tracks with the locally installed auto router. It has all the necessary functions and it creates g-code as well.
Last edited by A_Camera; 16-07-2019 at 07:53 AM.
-
16-07-2019 #7
I enjoy NOT having to deal with chemicals any more. In my opinion, it is just as fast to mill than to etch, if you take all the parameters into account. I have done a few surface mount PCB but prefer hole mounted parts. It's simply easier to handle and also to read the values and correct mistakes in design.
Drilling is really a non-issue, that's done accurately by the CNC, so it really doesn't matter. What is important is that the job can be restarted and repeated from the start because it does happen that the dill snaps and some times I don't see that before the job is done. This is especially the case with 0.6mm drills, I find them very easy to snap.
Anyway, SOIC is just fine but you need a good CNC with high enough accuracy and repeatability.
-
16-07-2019 #8
I don't always remove the copper earth plane, it depends on the proximity to the tracks and where I have to solder. I use Circuit Wizard, which is now not supported and is an old and creaky product and does not support surface mount components anyway. I find the circuit simulation good for a quick indication that I have got it right, although it doesn't handle floating logic inputs very well. It does allow me to juggle the component placing before routing the nets. The Gerber and drilling files it produces go into CopperCAM, again an unsupported program I have had yonks. This defines the tracks and can produce Gcode directly with earth plane copper removal if desired, but I prefer to output a dxf and control gcode production with EstlCAM. I can also introduce custom board outlines at this stage.
It is not the latest whizzy whizzy method, but it works for me and it is software I am familiar with.Last edited by cropwell; 16-07-2019 at 01:29 PM.
-
16-07-2019 #9
-
16-07-2019 #10
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
BOB 3 Axis, optical isolation
By thjremy in forum Electronic Project BuildingReplies: 7Last Post: 05-01-2014, 04:15 PM -
gerber to dxf for PCBs
By Web Goblin in forum Computer SoftwareReplies: 4Last Post: 26-10-2013, 08:25 PM -
NEW MEMBER: PCBs - desktop CNC - Hi from salisbury
By Plod in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 10Last Post: 07-09-2013, 09:34 AM -
PCB Isolation Routing
By Mad Professor in forum General DiscussionReplies: 3Last Post: 16-03-2011, 09:46 PM -
PCB Isolation Routing
By CHudson in forum Milling Machines, Builds & ConversionsReplies: 5Last Post: 10-10-2010, 08:34 PM
Bookmarks