. .
  1. #1
    I need to put a couple of connection parts onto an assembly of this kind:
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LP1.JPG 
Views:	188 
Size:	75.8 KB 
ID:	28638
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LP2.JPG 
Views:	181 
Size:	80.5 KB 
ID:	28639

    At first, I thought just to drop them onto a rotary table or indexer and run a 90 degree cutter back and forth every 15 degrees or so, cutting the teeth out radially from the centre but I quickly realized that that would mean contact only on the very outer edge or circumference of the part. So they would look like they are locked together but in fact, none of the faces on the inside would be in contact at all as they would all be falling away from each other.

    This one left me really scratching my head. I’ve not cut gears or anything like this before so there may be something obvious I’m missing. Any advice appreciated.

  2. #2
    Mmmm, tricky one as ideally you want the angle of the teeth to increase as you move outwards. If you're cutting with a constant angle cutter would turning each surface to a slightly concave conical section sort the problem I wonder? That way the angle of the teeth is constant but they become wider as you go outwards. Sorry I don't have any 3D CAD here at home to check it out. Alternatively cutting them as a square (or trapezoidal) section with the width increasing radially outwards would do (2 passes for each cut offset by 1/2 the angle) might sort it, but engagement would be more clunky than with triangular teeth.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Voicecoil View Post
    Mmmm, tricky one as ideally you want the angle of the teeth to increase as you move outwards. If you're cutting with a constant angle cutter would turning each surface to a slightly concave conical section sort the problem I wonder? That way the angle of the teeth is constant but they become wider as you go outwards. Sorry, I don't have any 3D CAD here at home to check it out. Alternatively cutting them as a square (or trapezoidal) section with the width increasing radially outwards would do (2 passes for each cut offset by 1/2 the angle) might sort it, but engagement would be more clunky than with triangular teeth.

    It’s tricky to get your head around, I had to mock it up in CAD before I understood it properly.
    Apart from the apex of the cut at the bottom of the teeth all the other faces and angles are falling away from each other.

    The easiest way to think of it is that all faces and corners are formed by the two cut faces meeting and the cutting tool paths draw closer to each other as they come closer to the centre.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	LP3.JPG 
Views:	142 
Size:	62.6 KB 
ID:	28643

    I’m not sure I even understand the geometry of mating radial teeth but I’m feeling that it’ll probably need to be a CNC path. I hope not but...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 3mm dia end mill for cutting carbon fibre sheet?
    By loadlover in forum Tool & Tooling Technology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-11-2018, 11:15 AM
  2. Please help me select a vendor for Hobby manual mill
    By suspension in forum Milling Machines, Builds & Conversions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-03-2018, 12:37 PM
  3. Mini-Mill / Router - Cutting Fluid??
    By Davek0974 in forum Milling Machines, Builds & Conversions
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 23-02-2016, 03:19 PM
  4. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-07-2014, 03:11 PM
  5. WANTED: CNC Mill/Router for Cutting Aluminium
    By kylelnsn in forum Items Wanted
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-08-2012, 09:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •