. .
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
  1. #11
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F5435101-9DBD-4FBB-ABDF-FDB4A1DF5664.jpg 
Views:	71 
Size:	170.9 KB 
ID:	29189Click image for larger version. 

Name:	54A28B18-22B7-48A8-89BC-5D6C27966978.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	261.3 KB 
ID:	29188Click image for larger version. 

Name:	C0C321FD-EC7C-4EEA-916D-259E4F922EB3.jpg 
Views:	68 
Size:	170.5 KB 
ID:	29190Hi Doddy,

    Going to check the continuity on the cables now.
    I’ve attached a couple of pictures of the spindle and the wires

    Thanks again for your help

  2. #12
    Thanks for those images, confirms m y assumption over the choice of spindle. Also indicates you have a small setup issue with Mach3 which is unimportant at this time. Your first post shows the VFD illuminating the FORward LED - I'm assuming you can drive this with an M3 command and extinguish it with an M5... thats really the last bit that would convince me that you have Mach3 control onto the VFD and that the problem lies in the VFD/wiring/spindle.

    Actually, you can check the continuity of the loom and spindle through those three sockets on the connector in the photo - just check for a couple of ohms between each pair (1-2, 2-3, 1-3).

  3. #13
    I’ve just checked the wires running from the spindle to the VFD and the three sockets on the connector and I’m getting a consistent reading on all of them.

    Does this mean it could be a MACH3 issue?

    Cheers
    Ben

  4. #14
    I don't think this is a Mach3 issue. You've said already that you can command a forward rotation from Mach3 onto the VFD (first post - "FOR" LED illuminated, "F400.0" commanding full speed rotation. No spindle movement.

    What were the measurements on the connector?

  5. #15
    Ok just hoping it might not be a hardware issue

    Here are the readings from the connector

    1825
    1780
    1755

  6. #16
    I'm assuming that those are the readings from the 3-pin connector, with the other end connected to the spindle. And that those are in the milli-Ohm range?

    I'm asking because I've just been to measure my 2.2kW spindle...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0551.jpg 
Views:	80 
Size:	246.8 KB 
ID:	29191

    All combinations between three pins were measured at 1.6 Ohm. (or, broadly speaking, 1600 milli Ohm) as...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0552.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	132.5 KB 
ID:	29193

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0553.jpg 
Views:	70 
Size:	280.1 KB 
ID:	29192

    A number of 1825, 1780 or 1755 would make sense, if on a milli-Ohm range (very unusual / expensive meter) - or possible presented as "1.825" Ohm?,

    A value of 1825 Ohm would concern me somewhat.

  7. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by Doddy View Post
    I'm assuming that those are the readings from the 3-pin connector, with the other end connected to the spindle. And that those are in the milli-Ohm range?

    I'm asking because I've just been to measure my 2.2kW spindle...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0551.jpg 
Views:	80 
Size:	246.8 KB 
ID:	29191

    All combinations between three pins were measured at 1.6 Ohm. (or, broadly speaking, 1600 milli Ohm) as...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0552.jpg 
Views:	74 
Size:	132.5 KB 
ID:	29193

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0553.jpg 
Views:	70 
Size:	280.1 KB 
ID:	29192

    A number of 1825, 1780 or 1755 would make sense, if on a milli-Ohm range (very unusual / expensive meter) - or possible presented as "1.825" Ohm?,

    A value of 1825 Ohm would concern me somewhat.
    I’ve double checked the readings and they are showing the same. The metre is showing its reading at milli-Ohm

  8. #18
    Ah, good... I did want to confirm that - it's unusual (or maybe I'm behind the times) to get general purpose DMMs with milli-Ohm ranges. Never mind, onwards and upwards.

    I'm assuming that you're confident then that the three phases of the motor are all in the same region of around 1.6-1.8 Ohm then that's largely convinced me that the spindle is okay - and that's no surprise, there's not usually problems with the spindle I would always check the harness (cables fracture over time if moved) - but I think you've discounted that. The weak link in the chain would always be the power electronics on the VFD.

    If you had a working system (ironic, I know) I'd recommend reconfiguring the VFD to drive it manually from the VFD just to remove every other variable from the equation, but not being able to test the spindle means this is likely to just add confusion to the situation. I'm depending on your description that you've been able to present demands from Mach to the VFD (creating the rotational demands - the 'F400.0'/'F090.0' etc previously, and the indication of a forward command ('FOR' LED on the first picture... though you've not re-confirmed that in a later question).

    At this point I personally would be measuring the 3-phase outputs from the VFD to the spindle, with a rotational demand of "F050.0" (M3 S300, I think we got to). But, this is something you should only attempt if you know what you're doing. My thoughts are, though, that you're likely to see basically no volts on the 3-phase output, then I'd be into the VFD to check the internal DC bus on the power board. But, unless you're confident with what you're doing I cannot recommend that you try this - it's potentially hazardous. Are you confident working on powered mains supplies?

  9. #19
    Quote Originally Posted by Doddy View Post
    Ah, good... I did want to confirm that - it's unusual (or maybe I'm behind the times) to get general purpose DMMs with milli-Ohm ranges. Never mind, onwards and upwards.

    I'm assuming that you're confident then that the three phases of the motor are all in the same region of around 1.6-1.8 Ohm then that's largely convinced me that the spindle is okay - and that's no surprise, there's not usually problems with the spindle I would always check the harness (cables fracture over time if moved) - but I think you've discounted that. The weak link in the chain would always be the power electronics on the VFD.

    If you had a working system (ironic, I know) I'd recommend reconfiguring the VFD to drive it manually from the VFD just to remove every other variable from the equation, but not being able to test the spindle means this is likely to just add confusion to the situation. I'm depending on your description that you've been able to present demands from Mach to the VFD (creating the rotational demands - the 'F400.0'/'F090.0' etc previously, and the indication of a forward command ('FOR' LED on the first picture... though you've not re-confirmed that in a later question).

    At this point I personally would be measuring the 3-phase outputs from the VFD to the spindle, with a rotational demand of "F050.0" (M3 S300, I think we got to). But, this is something you should only attempt if you know what you're doing. My thoughts are, though, that you're likely to see basically no volts on the 3-phase output, then I'd be into the VFD to check the internal DC bus on the power board. But, unless you're confident with what you're doing I cannot recommend that you try this - it's potentially hazardous. Are you confident working on powered mains supplies?
    I’m really not confident doing this test. But thank you so much for your help.

    Cheers
    Ben

  10. #20
    Here's a thought - with power removed, remove the two screws on the front of the VFD - not the ones mounting this to the back plate, but there's a removable panel on the front of the VFD - lower half. remove those and the panel slides off - exposing the screw terminals. Get a photo of that.

    EDIT: I'm clutching at straws of what you can examine safely at this point. It'd be embarrassing if one of the terminals had come loose from there.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Need Help! Spindle not running
    By Lumiyo Ben in forum Spindles & Drive Motors
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21-11-2020, 03:11 PM
  2. Running 4 1605 screws
    By kev20009 in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & Supports
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 22-02-2017, 10:33 PM
  3. Getting my Arburg c4 up and running
    By deadmeat30 in forum Moulding Machines
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 30-11-2015, 09:54 PM
  4. Advice on running YAG laser in UK
    By chriggy in forum Laser Machines & Building
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-02-2015, 02:29 PM
  5. Running costs of CNC machines?
    By .kyle in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 19-05-2011, 08:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •