Thread: Mounting motor under table?
Johnathan if you want the code your welcome to it, or any body else for that matter. It's a 17mb file thou and over a million lines of code, If I remember correct it took about hour n half.
I did another after that but with the Welsh dragon on the back side but didn't take any pics. . . . Looked good thou.!!
Enjoy and the pics don't show all the detail or do it justice. . . 150mm diameter 10mm Ali plate cut with a 6mm 90deg carbide chamfer/spot drill.
I agree that 10mm pitch is definitely the way to go if you want good feed-rates.
It's also mesmorizing to watch the toolpath do it's stuff the bloody thing bounce's all over the place, so much so when first started cutting I very nearly stopped it because I thought it had FUBARD.
I'm planning to go for ballscrew+ballnut, but I noted that, depending on where you look, there seems to be a big jump in price from the ballnuts without preload/zero backlash to the ones that do have it (which I would think are preferable). Going cheaper would get me running sooner, and having a working (albeit lower precision) machine to play with while building up more funds is preferable to me. There also seemed to be suggestions for ways to increase the effectiveness of the lower end ballnuts, though now that I think about it, they may have been talking about the acme setups. Hmm.
As for turning the ballscrews, I suppose that's a matter of perspective. If you have the skills and equipment but your time is money then yes, turning the ends down to fit the bearings probably is better left to the supplier. Would I do it that way? Ask me in 5 years
1610 rather than 1605, you say? I shall run that though the collection of calculations I'm building up.
The following picture is a rough mockup of what it's running - working area was originally planned at 200mmx200mm for the table, will have to be bigger simply to fit the stepper in the location parallel to the screw. The gantry will be close to the table but large so the X can run up quite high and still be supported, for reasons discussed elsewhere. "Scale" is a dirty word as far as this picture is concerned, don't read too much into it. The XY will not be completely seperate from the gantry, it was just easier to draw that way!
So to me it's not worth the hassle and all thou unprobable still possible risk of error.
RE: 1610 or 1605. I should clarify this depends on the intended use of the machine. If your going to use it to cutt intricate jewelry or want very fine detail then the small pitch is better but for a general allround machine then 10mm pitch works best in my experience.
All round, I'd guess. If I understood the earlier posts correctly, if I had a system for changing pulleys I could get the higher precision if needed, at the expense of speed? If so, this is one of the things that interest me about pulley systems.
Though I would normally advise 10mm pitch screws (I probably did earlier!) since this is such a small machine it may not make a lot of difference...having said that the main thing is getting high acceleration, otherwise you'll run out of travel before it hits top speed and has to decelerate. To do that a 2:1 (bigger on stepper) with a 10mm pitch screw would be ideal since the motor has to input only a quarter of the kinetic energy into the screw when accelerating compared to a 5mm pitch screw.
Your 'system' for changing pulleys is just an allen key plus a bit of space.
Agree with what jonathan says just one thing to point out 2:1 10mm pitch is effectivley 20mm pitch. If you can live with this loss of resolution then it's a good way to go.
What's your main intended use.?
Edit: Jonathans comment about accelleration is even more important if you plan to do lots of 3D and intricate V carving. 3D and intricate carving is very time consuming, esp vcarving, with lots of very small moves required with the Z axis dancing around all over the place. The problem with low accel is the commanded feed rate actually never get's meet and therefore the cutting time increase's. On very large 3D jobs this can run it several extra hours or even days.!!
Last edited by JAZZCNC; 05-09-2011 at 09:34 PM.
If you're using it for PCBs then you'll want good resolution, so probably best to use swappable 1:2 pulleys. Can't really thing of anything else that would require it. Maybe engraving, but generally for engraving it's relative position that matters more than absolute which means microstepping is more valuable.
By Musht in forum General ElectronicsReplies: 5Last Post: 27-10-2013, 08:58 PM
By luke11cnc in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & SupportsReplies: 4Last Post: 12-08-2011, 09:58 AM
By irving2008 in forum Machine DiscussionReplies: 17Last Post: 02-09-2010, 06:23 PM
By Vespa Mad in forum Items For SaleReplies: 8Last Post: 27-08-2009, 07:45 AM
By Steve-m in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 8Last Post: 28-02-2009, 12:12 AM