Thread: sliding gantry or sliding Base ?
sorry if this question has been discussed before, if so, i couldnt find it :)
I am currently thinking out my Design and I am not sure how to make the X Axis.
Either the whole Gantry slides, or the Gantry is fixed and the "Baseplate" slides (lack of the right english word, sry) ?
I will probably use 600mm TBR20 supported round rails for x and y, so thats what the size will be.
Anybody has empiric experience comparing the two methods ?
I want to design the gantry it self as per the paper posted in the faqs, problems, solutions forum regarding "heavy duty design".
I mean just the structural design, not the materials used.
Built from 40x40 Alu Profiles triangular reinforced, i already drew it that way but of course I forgot to make a screenshot :)
I personally prefer the "fixed gantry and sliding baseplate" design, that way I can make a really sturdy gantry.
Another slightly off topic question, that just popped in my head, would be how to fix the TBR20 Rails to the profiles, I dont know if I like the idea of just bolting them down with T Nuts, otherwise I would have to make adapter plates, which in turn would add some of the much desired mass to the system.
THanks in advance,
Regards RickAlways bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other - Abe Lincoln
I am aware that the machine footprint will be almost double the length if i am not using a sliding gantry.
My question is, is the advantage in structural rigidity worth it , or are there arguments against it, except the larger machine footprint.
I am mostly interested in
Anybody has empiric experience comparing the two methods ?
Regarding the mounting question of the supported Rails,
i probably will just use 40x80 Profile where the rails are, and just mount the rails with t nuts, as the spacing of the TBR20 is 40mm.
Any arguments against that ?
I want to avoid machining that large adapter plates.
Last edited by JohnJ; 05-11-2012 at 05:56 PM.
05-11-2012 #4Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other - Abe Lincoln
I didn't mean to offend you Rick,
just wanted to clarify that I already know the disadvantage of the machine being larger for the same workspace, i just didnt mention it in my first post, as it seems kind of obvious to me, sorry for the misunderstand regarding machine size, i should have said i would use 600mm rails if the gantry moves.
Could you tell me what experience you have made with the two methods please, thats whats most interesting for me.
Is the advantage of building a fixed gantry big enough to justify a larger machine foot print ?
Im Just a mirror my friend, i was just trying to clarify what you knew as you have few posts and as we get machinists from expert to never touched a spanner, the answer to your question is this, i decided to keep with the moving gantry design, even though there may be a requirement for larger motors, and more complex design, the effective working area and space needed sold it for me(7'X4'). But then with a design as small as yours i may have been tempted to go for the moving work area as The mass being moved would mean faster machining speeds, the chap to ask is jonathan as he has experience of both small and large machines alike although im not sure about the moving X in his case..
RickAlways bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other - Abe Lincoln
As you have probably noticed on your travels moving Gantry machines are almost always used for machines such as plasma cutters no load at tool tip, routing machines low to mid load at tool tip. Aluminium seems to be the bridge between both types and i have certainly seen more Steel machines with a moving X rather than a moving gantry.
Thanks for your answer,
so, if space wouldn't be an issue for you, you would opt for the fixed gantry, right ?
Regarding my experiences,
i only know a few industrial Milling Machines that are built with a bridge design,
for example the Datron Machines, which are good worthy Mills, have a bridge design, but they have a moving gantry and fixed table, which is probably due to size, as size is a big sales argument for industrial machines.
You are right, all the bridge type machines I can think of, have either no load at the tool tip, or only light load.
I can just think of industrial machines, as thats where my experience is from.
For now i will complete a 3D Design of a fixed gantry type machine, lets see if I like it at the end.
Nevertheless, i would love some more people to join the discussion and share their experiences.
With a fixed gantry you can make the gantry as strong as you want without worrying about its mass too much, since it's not moving. Clearly since the rails now need to be bigger it's likely to cost more, so you're using more space and money to get better rigidity which is nothing new. Also the motors now have to move the mass of the bed and whatever you cutting, which could add up to a considerable amount with an aluminium bed. Clearly this means you may have to spend more on the motors, although since the bearing blocks can be spaced out a lot, you should only need one ballscrew so that saves a bit compared to a moving gantry.
It will be significantly cheaper to use steel for the main frame, instead of extrusion. With a fixed gantry you can afford to get some big box section...
By wilfy in forum Rails, Guideways & BearingsReplies: 19Last Post: 23-03-2013, 06:56 PM
FOR SALE: Sliding head cnc lathes £5kBy jpcnc in forum Items For SaleReplies: 1Last Post: 29-05-2011, 08:00 PM
By jpcnc in forum Milling Machines, Builds & ConversionsReplies: 3Last Post: 14-03-2011, 07:25 AM
By cncgreg in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 2Last Post: 31-08-2010, 02:35 PM
By igusUK in forum Rails, Guideways & BearingsReplies: 0Last Post: 15-10-2009, 09:00 AM