-
10-04-2014 #1
Hi everyone, Ive had a major change of plan from my original design build. Its sort of grown a tad from the original X at 700mm to 1500mm so that I can drop a quarter sheet of plywood or phenolic ( high pressure laminate ) which will save me having to do tile the cuts on lots of jobs. I also want to be able to engrave a standard door or a lump of 4 / 6 thick oak post.
Im still working on the design at the moment but getting my head screwed up as to do I use belts or ball screws or both. Could I use belts to drive both the Y axis ball screws and use just one motor instead of synchronising 2 motors ? I was looking at using nema 23 - 425 Oz-in motors.
For the spindle I will be using an 1/2 router until I have enough funds to add a water cooled spindle. Ive done a plan view so you can get an idea of what I would like to build, all steel framed and using SBR20s for all the rails. X axis I was going to make up a lattice frame from aluminium extrusion and then laminate (epoxy) 2 sheets of 6 or 8mm plate to both sides, not sure how deep to make the beam but 6 or 8 (150 / 200mm)
As I want to be able to pass materials under the Y axis beams I was thinking of using 80x80x6mm with 50x50x3mm for the main frame, but might need to beef up the corners as this cnc will be floating on 4 corners. I welcome your input and wont take offence but I may take the gate LOL
Lets me have your ideas as its easier to to make changes at the design stage and a lot less expensive. Failure to prepare is to prepare to Fail.
Mike
-
11-04-2014 #2
First you'll get a stronger machine if you build it long and narrow rather than wide and short. It would also be easier to join ballscrews with a timing belt and use one motor and have the advantage of keeping screws in sync. Don't bother with timing belts only as they cost nearly as much as ballscrews by time you have bought belt and pulleys etc.
Also the ballscrews want to be 10mm pitch not 5mm if you planning on mainly cutting wood, if you need higher resolution then just put a ratio on the screws.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to JAZZCNC For This Useful Post:
-
11-04-2014 #3
Also, the 425oz Nema 23 motors are about the worst choice in Nema 23 motors. They have very high inductance, which results in very low torque at higher rpm's.
Gerry
______________________________________________
UCCNC 2022 Screenset
Mach3 2010 Screenset
JointCAM - CAM for Woodworking Joints
-
11-04-2014 #4
The ones people like to call 'nema 24' sometimes don't, for example:
Nema23 Stepper Motor 3.1Nm
(Mike: Don't take that as a recommendation yet - it may well be the motor you require, but you need to do more of the design before selecting motors)
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Jonathan For This Useful Post:
-
11-04-2014 #5
That's not a 425oz motor, it's 439. The OP said 425, so I don't think he's referring to that motor. All the 425oz motors I've ever seen are high inductance.
Gerry
______________________________________________
UCCNC 2022 Screenset
Mach3 2010 Screenset
JointCAM - CAM for Woodworking Joints
-
11-04-2014 #6
The motor I linked to and the following one are probably the most popular ones on this forum:
SY60STH88-3008BF
That's 3Nm, so 424.8oz-in and 3.2mH... close enough for you?
I've measured the inducance of both motors and it does match the rating, within a reasonable tolerance.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Jonathan For This Useful Post:
-
11-04-2014 #7
Thanks for your input Jazz, I had looked at doing it the way you suggested and may well go back to longer / narrower machine. Ball screw pitch I'm not sure what you mean by "ratio on the screws" I do need to have the higher resolution as the laminate I want to cut needs a high tolerance. It's harder than a lot of allies to cut / drill, so do you think I would be better using the 1605 bs ? I'm going take what you've said about the machines orientation and work on another plan, I do know I can rename the axis x & y to fit my machine.
Thanks Jonathan for the links to the motors. I've read your build logs with great interest well done. These are the motors / drive kit that I have been looking at 【Germany Ship】4Axis Nema23 stepper motor 425oz-in Dual & Driver CNC control kit | eBay and within my budget, your views are welcome on the kit. I'm keeping well away from those 268 drivers offered with some kits.
Thanks to all for your valued input.
Mike
-
11-04-2014 #8
Virtually all of the 425oz motors available in the US and through Ebay (from China) are high inductance. The ones you linked to are not commonly available over here. So just make sure you know what you're getting.
Gerry
______________________________________________
UCCNC 2022 Screenset
Mach3 2010 Screenset
JointCAM - CAM for Woodworking Joints
-
11-04-2014 #9
-
11-04-2014 #10
Yes, those are the high inductance motors I'm talking about. They'd need close to 100V to get the best performance out of them, but they give you a 36V supply.
But listen to what Jonathan said. You shouldn't just arbitrarily choose motors and drives. They need to match your choice of screws, and the machine to get the best performance from them. In some situations, motors half the size will easily outperform larger, high inductance motors.Gerry
______________________________________________
UCCNC 2022 Screenset
Mach3 2010 Screenset
JointCAM - CAM for Woodworking Joints
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
ballnut - balls back in via the side cover and using less balls than original
By dsc in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & SupportsReplies: 9Last Post: 16-11-2013, 04:27 PM -
Balls, balls and balls
By Swarfing in forum Marketplace DiscussionReplies: 15Last Post: 21-03-2013, 08:45 PM -
Advice: Timing Pulleys and Belts
By Mad Professor in forum Belt Drive, Pulleys & TimingReplies: 7Last Post: 24-06-2012, 12:30 PM -
Belts & pulleys & advice please
By CNCBlug in forum Belt Drive, Pulleys & TimingReplies: 12Last Post: 29-04-2012, 10:31 PM -
Lost my balls!!!
By danielbriggs in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & SupportsReplies: 26Last Post: 19-08-2010, 02:41 PM
Bookmarks