. .
  1. #1
    So, After spending a lot of time working through quite a few designs, many hours in CAD and reading lots of build logs. I have settled on a fixed gantry style design. I only need 500x500mm of working area and quite a high Z of 250mm. The machine is being built to mill aluminium, copper and plastics. So, strength is more important to me than size. I intend to use it mostly for electronics enclosures and PC watercooling blocks. Given I have no current machining capability, I have been designing with that limitation in mind(epoxy level all the things).

    I have settled on two Z designs. The standard 25mm alu tooling plate design and the novel steel gantry.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Fixed Gantry aluminium Z.JPG 
Views:	564 
Size:	549.0 KB 
ID:	20919




    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Fixed Gantry Steel Z.JPG 
Views:	1648 
Size:	568.2 KB 
ID:	20920

    The frame measures 1000x800mm. It is made of 100x100x4mm welded box section, with the gantry bolted to the base via two 10mm thick steel plates. The steel Z is 60x60x5mm box section. All alu is 25mm thick tooling plate.

    I am wondering, which Z design would be the best for my application?

    The overhang of spindle from the main gantry is 35mm more in the steel design than the aluminium. However, I would just like to go with the best option given my current capabilities. I am not competent enough to do a thorough FEA analysis of the options. Besides, I thought I'd ask those with the real world experience.

    What do you guys think?
    Last edited by Electroconducive; 28-02-2017 at 07:23 PM.

  2. #2
    I think that the first, traditional design is the best. The second one will be too complicated and it must also lift not only the Z and the spindle, but also the whole gantry. I also think that squaring the second one, and also driving up and down, would be too complicated and difficult. So my vote definitely goes to the traditional design, which is similar to mine. Milling aluminum will not be a problem.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by A_Camera View Post
    I think that the first, traditional design is the best. The second one will be too complicated and it must also lift not only the Z and the spindle, but also the whole gantry. I also think that squaring the second one, and also driving up and down, would be too complicated and difficult. So my vote definitely goes to the traditional design, which is similar to mine. Milling aluminum will not be a problem.
    Thanks for the reply :)

    You're right, the second one with the moving steel box section would be harder to square. I'd be driving the z with two 1605 ballscrews a belt and either a nema23 or 34 to avoid racking. I was thinking, given that I would really like to maximise the Z height as much as possible.

    Would the steel version be more rigid at max z extension? Or, would the additional distance of the spindle from the fixed gantry in the X direction negate any rigidity advantages?

    I am willing to put up with a little bit more of a complicated build for a stronger Z at full extension.

    Then again, maybe I am conceptualising this all wrong and it's pointless to even attempt the steel Z.

  4. #4
    Hi, if you're after maximum rigidity I'd go for the twin ballscrew design. If you're not limited by space then put the ballscrews on the outside of the frame and drive with a single stepper and belt like you say. There'll be no problems squaring it with simple tools and once squared it will stay that way.

    Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
    Neil...

    Build log...here

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by njhussey View Post
    Hi, if you're after maximum rigidity I'd go for the twin ballscrew design. If you're not limited by space then put the ballscrews on the outside of the frame and drive with a single stepper and belt like you say. There'll be no problems squaring it with simple tools and once squared it will stay that way.

    Sent from my HUAWEI VNS-L31 using Tapatalk
    Thanks, Putting the ballscrews either side will also let me shave 10mm off the overhang. Weird Steel Z design it is then.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Electroconducive View Post
    Thanks, Putting the ballscrews either side will also let me shave 10mm off the overhang. Weird Steel Z design it is then.
    I definitely like the idea, even if I think it will be more difficult to make it than the conventional type. I hope you will continue to post regarding the progress because I am certainly interested in following this up. My machine is also a fixed gantry type (conventional Z design) and I am interested in every possible way of improving it.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by A_Camera View Post
    I definitely like the idea, even if I think it will be more difficult to make it than the conventional type. I hope you will continue to post regarding the progress because I am certainly interested in following this up. My machine is also a fixed gantry type (conventional Z design) and I am interested in every possible way of improving it.
    When I finish the initial CAD design I will start a build log. I am very happy to let others learn from my mistakes, and hopefully have others help me avoid making too many of them.

    I have a budget of around £2K. I already bought an AC/DC Tig welder and have secured the use of a garage for the project. So, I will hopefully be making real progress soon.

  8. #8
    When I finish the initial CAD design I will start a build log. I am very happy to let others learn from my mistakes, and hopefully have others help me avoid making too many of them.
    That would be good and in the spirit (pardon the pun) of the forum it also keeps all the questions and answers in one place. Good luck with the build.

    edit. don't forget the pics
    Last edited by Clive S; 02-03-2017 at 02:51 PM.
    ..Clive
    The more you know, The better you know, How little you know

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BUILD LOG: over kill?3040 fixed gantry cnc
    By dazza in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-11-2016, 01:28 AM
  2. Fixed z axis to gantry design
    By Lachlan in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 20-10-2015, 09:50 PM
  3. New build – input/comments appreciated
    By ngundtoft in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 73
    Last Post: 05-10-2015, 11:38 AM
  4. BUILD LOG: Vertical fixed gantry. Design & build. (Steel/epoxy)
    By Greeny in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 19-08-2013, 08:26 PM
  5. BUILD LOG: Fixed Gantry Router
    By lateAtNight in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 28-05-2009, 11:30 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •