1. #1
    Well after perusing the idea of a fixed gantry style router, I just couldn't bring myself to build something that lost so much cutting area for its size. So this will have a moving gantry. Please comment on my design as constructive criticism is most welcome!

    I just couldn't bear to wait any longer so I have already built the base I know this was risky and stupid but I just had to do something and I was sick of dithering. I am also still coming to terms with Solidworks so modeling is still painful for me at times (most times).

    This router will be used for aluminium and mdf so needs to be rigid. I am building it out of 50x50x5 which after fabricating it, surely must be plenty strong enough for the job at hand. I note that many others on this forum use much, much larger steel box section but I need this to be movable and light enough to lift. The router design will be loosely built around Boyan Silyavski's excellent example though with a smaller cutting area and smaller box section.

    This build will take a long time as I have only steel at the moment and I will need to save in order to buy all the necessary components.
    So far i have settled on
    425oz steppers
    1605 z axis
    1610 x, y axis
    20mm linear profile rail x,y,z
    htd 15mm belt and pulley (20 tooth)
    drivers and BOB not sure

    Base model
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	basemodelphoto.jpg 
Views:	126 
Size:	29.3 KB 
ID:	16421

    Base being built

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151026_132559.jpg 
Views:	124 
Size:	64.0 KB 
ID:	16423 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151026_132653.jpg 
Views:	118 
Size:	64.0 KB 
ID:	16424 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151026_152336.jpg 
Views:	156 
Size:	64.1 KB 
ID:	16425 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151029_115200.jpg 
Views:	143 
Size:	64.6 KB 
ID:	16426

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151101_125121.jpg 
Views:	130 
Size:	64.0 KB 
ID:	16427

    Finished base
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151103_111549.jpg 
Views:	138 
Size:	64.6 KB 
ID:	16428 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151104_105307.jpg 
Views:	128 
Size:	64.6 KB 
ID:	16429 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151104_105327.jpg 
Views:	166 
Size:	64.7 KB 
ID:	16430

    Some notes on building the base:
    Absolutely need a straight edge for alignment
    Tack in the middle and then weld both sides after confirming it is straight and level.
    Even when welding short beads the welds have the potential to warp and move the steel members.
    Only use F clamps and G clamps. Notice in one of the pictures i have a blue quick clamp. Don't use these! They have their place, but not with this project, must be rigidly held in place.
    Building to be as precise as I can is slow! Its at least 3 times slower than gate building so take your time check weld check again, check in the other direction, find out its out by a 1mm, swear, grind the tack, reposition,clamp, tack again and so on. The beauty of a project like this is if you are not good at welding to start with you will be by the end because there are soo many welds to do.

    The left front upright member was 2mm out, at the top rail, after the final weld, (this is before I added the flatbar bracing) even with constant checking, so I thought that I would use an old trick and got the thickest rope I could find and wound it around the top of the upright and then diagonally down to the base. then proceeded to twist the rope with a steel bar after all it was only 2mm that i needed. Well the rope SNAPPED!!! The steel had not moved.

    Time to move it up a gear! Next,I got the tractor chain and did the same thing only with 100mm box section (1 metre long) rather than the 60cm long steel bar, but i couldn't apply enough force to move it. So finally I used a crowbar through the box section and only then was I able to attain the necessary leverage to pull the upright member into perfect alignment.This activity was all on the least braced section of the frame. Surely, the frame will be rigid enough.

    My next installment will model the router's gantry, though this is far more complex to model so may take me a while. Thanks for dropping by!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20151101_180341.jpg 
Views:	116 
Size:	64.5 KB 
ID:	16422  
    Last edited by Lachlan; 04-11-2015 at 04:11 AM.

  2. #2
    Looking good. You are going down a tried and trusted route with this design so far so should be ok.

    p.s. As I write this it is a cold, dark, rainy morning - jealous of your views and weather!
    Building a CNC machine to make a better one since 2010 . . .
    MK1 (1st photo), MK2, MK3, MK4

  3. #3
    Looking good. You are going down a tried and trusted route with this design so far so should be ok.

    p.s. As I write this it is a cold, dark, rainy morning - jealous of your views and weather!
    Thanks mate, I spent 12 months in England many years ago. The people were heaps of fun but I don't miss the constant drizzle and gloom.

    I have 2 different ideas in mind. Can people please comment on which they think is better or if I have completely dropped the ball suggest a better design altogether.

    Gantry Frame Design 1
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	gantryrough.jpg 
Views:	116 
Size:	29.7 KB 
ID:	16460 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	gantryrough1.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	29.5 KB 
ID:	16461
    Seems to be a more conventional design. Maybe better Braced then alternative
    Heavier 23kg
    • Spindle will be slightly in front of leading edge of front gantry y axis linear rail block. Could lengthen gantry from 250mm to 300mm to fix this or could reduce box section from 200x100x4 to 200x50x4 don't really like either option.
    • More chance of warp due to more welding
    • More complex to work with, holes and relief cuts needed to fit necessary components in back of gantry.

    Gantry Frame Design 2
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	assembly2.jpg 
Views:	109 
Size:	29.7 KB 
ID:	16462 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	assembly2a.jpg 
Views:	143 
Size:	29.4 KB 
ID:	16463

    • simpler to build
    • Spindle is within leading edge of linear guide maybe more stable (spindle not drawn just calculated)
    • lighter (20kg) just frame as shown
    • Easier to add componentry to back of gantry


    • ? Maybe less rigid due to having no back bracing on the gantry.
    • Fixing the 2 y axis linear guides to the back of the gantry will be more difficult

    So which broad design do you think is better and why? Also is weight going to be a problem? Maybe another 30 ish kg to add to gantry with steppers, guides, z axis etc. Will 425oz steppers be too weak?
    Thanks for any advice given!

  4. #4
    Hi, nice design, I think you are off to a great start. Will be following your progress :)

    I would go with option 2, because it will be a little easier, but equal in strength. The center of gravity on the blocks will also be better.

Similar Threads

  1. BUILD LOG: Desktop size steel welded router 3 axis
    By Tom J in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 28-03-2017, 08:36 PM
  2. Affordable cnc router desktop
    By calida in forum Milling Machines, Builds & Conversions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-02-2017, 01:42 PM
  3. BUILD LOG: Small rigid router - Design advise needed
    By mitchejc in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 120
    Last Post: 17-06-2015, 07:12 AM
  4. FOR SALE: Desktop Router
    By j4son in forum Items For Sale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-06-2010, 05:53 PM
  5. Homemade desktop CNC - cutting 0.8mm mild steel out the question?
    By HankMcSpank in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 16-04-2010, 08:37 AM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts