Hybrid View
-
25-09-2019 #1
Looking at my machine whilst wiring up the closed loop steppers and cursing the Chinese bods who don't use screened cable for the motor wires - WHY??? -there's 48V switching edges on those wires!!!!! - I suddenly thought why not put the driver modules on the machine next to the motors? That way all you have to run from the control box is low powered step/direction/enable lines which could easily live in a a bit of 26 AWG 6 core screened cable (about 4.5mm diameter) connected by M12 connectors and power which could be a few strands of 1mm2 wire twisted together*, or if you're flash some high power flexible coax like the Mogami 3082.
* actually 2 x 2 x 0.5mm2 would be better on reflection.
-
25-09-2019 #2
Denford never used shielded wiring to stepper motors, and it's never caused them any problems.
Having the drivers at the motors is nothing new, but it's not something I'd personally want to do unless the step/dir were using differential signals.Avoiding the rubbish customer service from AluminiumWarehouse since July '13.
-
26-09-2019 #3
I can see that as long as your limit switch wiring is well shielded then it shouldn't be a problem as far as the machine is concerned. However I'm conscious that I have some short lengths of the original unscreened cable of the limit switches in use (WHY don't they cable them with twin screened rather than the pissy miniature 3 core stuff???), and besides which I would like to be able to listen to the radio interference free whilst I'm working!
-
26-09-2019 #4
In my Triac, the only shielded wiring were the original spindle motor tacho wires, and one of the tool carousel sensors. Everything else is unshielded, and runs in the same cable tracks as power wiring.
However, Denford always used 12 or 24V for control wiring, so noise should never be a problem.
Given the amount of effort it takes to properly and reliably shield wiring, I'm surprised more people don't use higher voltage signal wiring.Avoiding the rubbish customer service from AluminiumWarehouse since July '13.
-
26-09-2019 #5An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.
-
26-09-2019 #6
-
27-09-2019 #7
One of the problems of being an engineer in that field is you can be more aware of the technical quality than the program content.
I was very much a talk radio man, R4 and the World Service were my favourites, but rarely watched television. I spent the last 16 of those years as a lecturer at the BBC's technical training school and was known for saying of TV "I teach people how it works, I'm not obliged to watch it". I usualy had (still have) no idea who people were talking about when discussing programmes. Unless it was David Attenbourough of course.
Voicecoil,
If you're going to be THAT determined even the power of Auntie will have to give in.An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.
-
26-09-2019 #8
That's entirely logical, but it's perfectly possible to knock out VHF-FM. A few years back I was designing a class D (PWM) audio power amplifier which ran on similar power rails to an 80V stepper driver and with a not dissimilar switching frequency (about 300KHz IIRC). In spite of the pretty massive LC output filter, with a lead running to the loudspeaker consisting of a couple of pieces of 1.5mm2 twisted together it completely obliterated VHF reception in the workshop.
-
25-09-2019 #9
It's a cunning plan. There could be problems with dust and vibration for the drivers mounted on your gantry and don't forget that the power cables feeding the drivers, which will have to come from the control box alongside the control cables, will not have a smooth DC current flow, though you could add some filtering at each driver to reduce that.
The biggest problem I can see is that you are replacing the nice short signal cables between your controller and the drivers by several metres of 'antenna' wiring which will have to run alongside the still noisy stepper driver power cabling and the VERY noisy spindle power cabling from your VFD. It might be case of frying pans and fires in spite of your best efforts at screening. But please don't stop thinking out loud!
In my controller the break-out is mounted inside it's own screening box and has short screened cables running to the drivers leaving only about 20mm of exposed wiring. The output cables are deliberately routed away from the inputs to minimise coupling. I've cut the motor's own wires quite short and use screened cable to connect back to the drivers with all the cable screens connected only at the controller end. Limit switch inputs have 1uF capacitors across them to prevent noise-induced false triggering. I haven't had any problems since upgrading the controller to this design.
KitLast edited by Kitwn; 25-09-2019 at 11:25 PM.
An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.
-
26-09-2019 #10
Aye, I can see that dust etc. might be a problem and was thinking of a cover to minimise that.With a suitable cable (starquad or high current coaxial) I don't think the current flow in the power line would be too much of an issue.
The biggest problem I can see is that you are replacing the nice short signal cables between your controller and the drivers by several metres of 'antenna' wiring which will have to run alongside the still noisy stepper driver power cabling and the VERY noisy spindle power cabling from your VFD. It might be case of frying pans and fires in spite of your best efforts at screening. But please don't stop thinking out loud!
In my controller the break-out is mounted inside it's own screening box and has short screened cables running to the drivers leaving only about 20mm of exposed wiring. The output cables are deliberately routed away from the inputs to minimise coupling. I've cut the motor's own wires quite short and use screened cable to connect back to the drivers with all the cable screens connected only at the controller end. Limit switch inputs have 1uF capacitors across them to prevent noise-induced false triggering. I haven't had any problems since upgrading the controller to this design.
KitLast edited by Voicecoil; 26-09-2019 at 01:08 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Has anyone please got an idea where I could get a bolt like this?
By suesi34e in forum Marketplace DiscussionReplies: 31Last Post: 13-01-2015, 01:06 AM -
Website idea.
By qwertyjon in forum General DiscussionReplies: 18Last Post: 11-07-2014, 08:49 PM -
Website idea.
By qwertyjon in forum General ComputingReplies: 8Last Post: 05-04-2014, 03:29 PM -
crazy idea
By kingcreaky in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 3Last Post: 27-08-2013, 07:54 PM -
BUILD LOG: Mel's Odd Idea
By mel_earp in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 3Last Post: 19-03-2010, 11:54 AM
Bookmarks