. .
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
  1. #31
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrewg View Post
    So I am still mulling design options
    Is there something wrong with me finding the sight of Dean's machine undresses slightly arousing?! I certainly now 'get' the neatness and economy of this single leadscrew Y axis design:
    There is twin screw version as well.!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2014-05-18 16.46.13.jpg 
Views:	162 
Size:	202.3 KB 
ID:	27871

  2. #32
    Or a Twin screw single motor version.!!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0587.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	203.7 KB 
ID:	27875

  3. #33
    Thanks Doddy, clearly those trying to design a 'kit in a box' have slightly different design and costs pressures to the self builder, so I am interested in the cognescenti here views on the design .

    Broadly one off self builds benefit from overspecifying their parts, as the costs are not significantly greater and there is less experience to show where corners can be cut. However kit makers need to reduce parts costs inorder to have a margin. Some of those decisions will be good and worth learning from if properly understood, others potentially to compromise too far.

    So for example JazzCNC has recommended strong 4Nm AC closed loop steppers, this kit has entry level closed loop steppers. Clearly both are sold on the advantages of closed loop, which is a good signal as the kit builder would question the extra cost.. That they might (oh, just have��) disagree on spec would not surprise me because the kit builder will have the minimum you can get away with.

  4. #34
    Quote Originally Posted by JAZZCNC View Post
    There is twin screw version as well.!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2014-05-18 16.46.13.jpg 
Views:	162 
Size:	202.3 KB 
ID:	27871
    Which is why when you recommend single screw as sufficient for a 600 wide machine, we listen, as you have done them all, not just stating what you did in your single build!......but anything you do like about their approach?

  5. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrewg View Post
    Thanks Doddy, clearly those trying to design a 'kit in a box' have slightly different design and costs pressures to the self builder, so I am interested in the cognescenti here views on the design .
    The design is ok and can't fault it really because to be honest Shaun as took most of my design principles and used them, just with different materials and put is own twist on it with twin rails. But essentially he's used my design principles, whether he'd admit that or not I doubt it.!!

    Now I see issues with it which I'm not going to enlighten him or you with.!! . . . But what I would ask is why would anyone buy a machine they have to build themselves, which effectively means all they are doing is saving them selfs drilling and tapping holes in aluminum plate.?

    Also, why buy a machine who's got an electrical spec which is far less than ideal and run on a Micky mouse control system running on a £9.50 development board fastened to another board that you can only buy from them when it goes Boom.!

    Ok it's got closed loop but they are cheap nasty things with unknown integrated drives and running on 36v.! . . . Those that know, know that 36V is pathetic for router and these guys know this.!!. . . So a good question to ask would be why are they using 36V.?

    Oh and then for £5.5K you still have a bloody Dremal for a spindle.!!

  6. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrewg View Post
    Thanks Doddy, clearly those trying to design a 'kit in a box' have slightly different design and costs pressures to the self builder.

    Including recover of NRE, operating costs and profit. I'm not bashing them - they are a commercial concern, but I would expect for what I can expect their sales for a machine like this their skim off the top will be in the order of £1000-1500.

    As an amateur, or enthusiast, or amateurish enthusiast then I make a decision as to the worth of that, and my tinker time. For me, I'd build from scratch, or bung Jazz 3k. If you want an off-the-shelf kit then it could be a viable approach.

  7. #37
    How desperate are you to get the machine up and working for you? That's the real buy v build question since the cost of building an equivalent quality machine, including paying for a decent hobby-grade pillar drill and other tools, will be well below the prices quoted above. You'll need some of those tools for additional work on the parts you make with the router anyway.
    An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.

  8. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitwn View Post
    How desperate are you to get the machine up and working for you? That's the real buy v build question since the cost of building an equivalent quality machine, including paying for a decent hobby-grade pillar drill and other tools, will be well below the prices quoted above. You'll need some of those tools for additional work on the parts you make with the router anyway.
    Yes you are right - at £4.5k for a proven design, I though UKCNC's kit might stand against a self build with £2.5k parts cost, but at nearer £5.5k and lower spec components in some key areas it does not IF you have the ability to successfully pull off a self-build yourself and have the time. I hope their kit is successful and finds a market but I am still here banging on about self-build.

    I guess my theme is that for a home workshop machine, 'MAKE' seems still to be a viable cost effective solution IF you have a suitable, 'worked out in detail, proven' design to follow and the understanding of the processes required. I think this forum champions this and has contributors that help others succeed. HOWEVER inferring from the many build logs that peter out and other discussions here, it appears many new builders grossly underestimate the time and expense that their dreams will require, are over ambitious and the majority FAIL to get from aspiration to using their CNC as a tool in their business or hobby.

    As Doddy mentioned - perhaps a MYCNCUK reference design would be a good aspiration. It sort of is hiding in the shadows of many a build log and post here (and has JazzCNC's finger prints all over it). As talk is cheap, I want to resolve a design and approach that works for me before committing any money to my own build, and hope others will benefit from the process. meanwhile I hope someone offers a kit or product that compares favorably to my developed spec, so I don't have to waste my time reinventing the cnc router and get on with process and product development using it in my furniture workshop.

  9. #39
    There is almost too much information available for a beginner to know where to start and I simpathise greatly. If you look at other forums and blogs from CNC users you find people cutting wood using machines that would be laughed out of town by MYCNC forum members. Angle iron (or even aluminium) and skate bearings for rails, plywood frames for base and gantry, Makita routers as spindles and so on. If you want to make carved signs, bass relief maps of New Zealand to hang on the wall or other decorative pieces they will work well enough, but my own experience tells me that if you want to cut out pieces of wood that will fit closely together, which I believe is your aim, then you need the kind of machine described on this forum.

    Whether that commercial machine is capable of such accuracy I have no idea but some demonstration from the manufacturer before you purchase it would be advisable. You should also confirm that the spindle can cope with the kind of cuts you want to make. I'd want to see an example machine cut out some pieces to my design before parting with that much cash. One of the things you'd expect to be paying for by buying a commercial product is a guaranteed level of performance.

    I like the idea of a MYCNC reference design, and there are several close approaches to be found here, but there would need to be at least half a dozen variants to suit different budgets and requirements. The steel v aluminium choice will be different for different people and a wood-only machine can be a little less robust than a machine for cutting aluminium, though the dimensional accuracy still needs to be very good. Probably one of the trickiest parts of the design is deciding how you are going to do the final alignment of the machine and how to design it to make that as easy as possible. You need to keep this in mind from the start and a good reference design would include how to align it for best possible performance from the materials chosen.

    Sorry, that turned into a bit of a brain-dump but what else are we going to do stuck indoors every evening? Maybe that should be a topic of it's own!
    An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.

  10. #40
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitwn View Post
    Sorry, that turned into a bit of a brain-dump but what else are we going to do stuck indoors every evening? Maybe that should be a topic of it's own!
    No thanks for thoughts - having more time to think about these things and hoping a few of you would too, is why I started my thread now.

    You are right I am after a reliable wood workshop tool. It therefore does not need the duty cycle of a production CNC but must be robust and quick enough that when you turn to it, you can set it up and run a cut in a few minutes. Like other workshop machinery it will probably run a for a few minutes 5-15 times a day with a few longer jobs from time to time. I want to cut joinery so 0.1mm accuracy and repeatable must be delivered. I know that issues like safety enclosure, dust collection, fixturing and programming are just as important to get an effective tool, but first I need the right design.

    Any reference design ere would have to 'show it's working' so each builder could decide whether to follow, enhance or cut corners but a few things are coming clear (I think) for the first time builder like me:

    Aim, to minimise part count, processes (like no milling or welding), tools, time and complexity and so risk of getting to a working machine.

    1. Size - You will always want to make it just a little bit bigger, but the challenges get tougher with size. So with ballscrews keep it below 1.5m and ideally below 1m in any axis. The shorter the axis the better for a first machine! So I am shooting for 600x600x125, but the design should scale to 100500x1000x175

    2. Frame - Welded steel with triangulation for rigidity is best budget performance for self build, if you have access to welding. Epoxy leveling can give you the precision alignment of surfaces without post machining. However Aluminum Extrusion and 20mm Aluminium end plates is capable for a smaller non-metal cutting machine if heavy duty versions are used. I keen to avoid steel work and welding so am going the Aluminum extrusion route. Ideally plate designs will rely on precision marking and drilling of holes only to provide

    3. Linear motion - Hiwin style profile rails should be used on all axis, all be it cheaper Chinese copies are good enough. They not only deliver the essential rigidity in all but the direction of motion, but the rails are a major precision structural element of the frame, don't need adjustment or maintenance. 20mm rails all around are ideal for this size of machine, whilst 15mm rails could be used.

    4. Ball screws - Again cheap C7 Chinese ballscrews give high precision, low maintenance, low backlash, high efficiency so should be used throughout. 1610 on X and &m, 1605 on Z or 1610 with 2:1 gearing

    5. Y Axis - Single central ballscrew fine for up to 750 width, but beyond that twin ball screws better, and allow for smaller motors (Same as other axis)

    6. X Axis - L shaped gantry design. Rails on top/bottom of front of gantry. Ball screw on back. L from two 45x90 Bosch style extrusions allow BHK/BF12 bearings for ballscrew to mount directly to it, as does 20mm rails.

    7. Z axis/X plate - Z axis is simple challenge of sandwiching rilsa and ballscrews between two plates, with 20mm raisl 15mm narrower than ballscrew assembly. X plate more complicated

    8. Spindle - 2.2kw water cooler spindle seems standard, mostly as the ER20 collet takes up to 1/2in router bits and is quiet for long runs. I'm still wondering if this is overkill for wood cutting where max of 8mm cutters might be enough for most jobs.

    9 Steppers - You need power not so much for speed as acceleration. Closed loop are now more affordably and give more power, smoother/quieter running and accuracy/safety as they will error if steps lost rather than spoiling project and/ ripping machine appart in accident! High voltage and low inductance motors allow the power to be delivered, so motors and drivers can be selected appropriate - 3Nm Nema 23 or bigger probably;y required

    10 Wiring and control box - Each step is simple but there is a lot of it. Drag chains,earthing, connectors, safe separation of mains and low voltage. Electrical
    interference, especially if there is a VFD for the spindle. etc Know little at this time about this area so much more work needed to define.

    So before I order my rails+ballscrews set and my steppers plus driver from Aliexpress, my extrusions from Motedis and my controller from UNCNC. I need to be confident I have a design and and a route to the required machined Aluminium plates to pull it all together along with abuild approach (as you pint out, and I have only recently picked up - alignment of rails etc is critical)


    SO another too long brain dump - you can see why I need to get this out, ti feels 2/3 complete but mising bits...back to CAD

Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BUILD LOG: Design stage - All steel - 1200x750x110 - aluminium capable (hopefully)
    By oliv49 in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-06-2018, 01:18 PM
  2. WANTED: cnc capable milling machine
    By franky in forum Items Wanted
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-07-2015, 06:05 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26-04-2013, 08:37 AM
  4. colchester student 1800 help with knowin what my lathe is capable of
    By whensparksfly in forum Milling Machines, Builds & Conversions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 26-01-2012, 03:30 PM
  5. New UK manufactured Lowcost Plasma table
    By adscnc in forum Manufacturer News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-05-2011, 05:45 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •