looks good to me mate nice to see some steel and not ally ;) and here's a thanks
Printable View
looks good to me mate nice to see some steel and not ally ;) and here's a thanks
Tensioner shaft
Attachment 3778 Attachment 3777
with 3 pieces of 688z bearings each
Attachment 3779 Attachment 3780
Job finally done :)
Attachment 3781 Attachment 3782 Attachment 3776
That looks neat. I can't really think of a good reason why, but having both motors running on the same belt doesn't seem like a good idea. Why not just have one going to each ballscrew? At the very least that means shorter belts, so lower inertia (probably negligeble). I guess the only thing it gains is preventing racking occuring.