If you had the choice, for an aluminium router, would use supported rail, or precision linear rails. You know the ones with the carriages, rather than the bearing blocks?
Pros and cons of each?
Cheers,
Dave.
Printable View
If you had the choice, for an aluminium router, would use supported rail, or precision linear rails. You know the ones with the carriages, rather than the bearing blocks?
Pros and cons of each?
Cheers,
Dave.
The supported rails are better then the unsupported mate, however if its your first machine look at what you want it to do, if you get 20mm rail over a shorter distance then you would get a way with it. Getting one up and running first, then look at the cost side of it and build to your budget.
Once your more in the know, maybe spend a little more and build an even better machine.
Have a read of this post: http://www.mycncuk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=256
What about these?
http://www.slidesandballscrews.com/2...50783c1223df24
Its just after Kieth saying in effect saying my first design was crap, I went back to the drawing board. It got slightly better, but now for a third time (and hopefully final time) I re-designed, to... (see pic). Which uses linear rails.
I'd rather have linear rails because the attach easily to aluminium profile, where as supported rail, i would need to do lots of drilling etc. So what I was basically asking was, can I get away with using the rail, or is round supported better?
Have a look at this machine: www.cncdudez.com
Let me know when you want to buy the ali frame i can get it quite cheap!
Cheaper than KJN?
http://www.aluminium-profile.co.uk/a...m_Profile.html
No sorry they are about the same.
What are you looking at machining? Looking at your design either supported round rail or the profiled rail would do.
I think the 20mm profiled rail is a bit of an overkill for hte size of you machine? and 15mm would be fine.
With the round rail you can also use the SHF mountings for supporting the rail and this will connect direct to the aluminium profiles with t slots.
Gary
Quote:
Originally Posted by lateAtNight
Lee; thanks for the link. There is some interesting stuff on there.
Gary... Yes the 20mm was over kill, I was just messing around. Although I find it quite funny that you knew it was 20 just from the pic :D. 15 it is...
Do you mind me asking if Zaps linear rails are the same as Marchant Dice? There seems to be a fair price difference, but you seem to have bigger carriages, so I am assuming thats where the price difference comes from?
Do you think I could get away with using 2 carriages on the Y axis?
Looking to machine aluminium... Small (ish) parts, but quite deep probably... ie i'm not just making signs or engraving.
The reason i said that the 20mm profiled rail is most likely an overkill, was based on the design of the machine and what he is machining.
This is just an estimation because no real data is available, but the the basic loading of the BRH15 is 850kgf (dynamic) and the BHF20 is 1450kgf.
How much load will machining small pieces of ali impose on the bearing?
I cant imagine it is anyware near what the bearings is capable of?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kip
Hi All,
Been doing further research into cutting forces etc to get an idea on what size rails apply for different situations. To do this I investigated drilling and side and end milling operations.
Example 1: Drilling 5mm hole, 10mm deep into Aluminium. Based on a cutting speed of 100m/min this requires a drill speed of 6500rpm. Assuming a feed rate of .018mm/rev = 120mm/min (2mm/sec) this will take 5seconds (although you'd probably peck it so might take twice this in reality). At that feedrate the axial force is approximately 25N (i.e. equivalent to a point weight of 2.5kg). The equivalent for for steel is 2500rpm and .75mm/sec giving a cutting load of 60N. This shows that machine for steel has to be at least 3 times as rigid for the same accuracy as one for drilling aluminium.
Example 2: Drilling 2mm hole, 10mm deep into aluminium using a high spindle speed of 25000rpm. Assuming the same feedrate of .018mm/rev gives a minimum cutting time of 1.3sec and an axial force of 10N
Example 3: Endmilling a 5mm wide cut in aluminium using a 10mm, 2 flute cutter and 0.5mm deep cuts. Normally you'd work out the spindle speed here, but actually for a hobby machine its feed rate thats the issue as we ned to try and get the feed rate per tooth high enough. For a 10mm cutter we are ideally looking for 0.05-0.1mm/tooth so for a 5000rpm spindle speed with a 2 flute cutter we need 500mm/min which is quite high for a hobby machine, single flute cutters would be better but hard to find. Assuming for the moment a feed rate of 500mm/min (thats 100rpm on a 5mm pitch leadscrew) and a spindle speed of 5000rpm, giving a cutting surface speed of 157m/min which is in the range for aluminium (100 - 1000 approx, but the higher you go the more critical coolant/lubricant becomes - at the lower speeds a squirt of WD40 is OK, higher needs more sophistication) and a feed per tooth of .05mm/dent (2 flute). The material removal rate is 1.25cc/min and the input power (over the no load power) needed at the spindle is about 45W with a radial cutting force of 4.5N. Assuming no Z movement there will be little axial forces. This sounds low, but remember we are only removing 1cc/min which is a tiny cut. To put this in perspective, to create a stepper motor mount 80 x 80mm x 8mm from 100mm square, 10mm stock would take 30min or more just in cutting time to rough out and up to 10min for the finishing cut.
Example 4: To remove 1mm from the edge of a 10mm thick piece of stock using an endmill in one pass using a 10mm cutter. At 500mm/min and a 2 flute cutter the spindle speed needs to be reduced to 2500rpm and the power input will be approx 170W above no load power. Cutting forces will be around 40 - 50N primarily in the feed direction with a proportion (20%) perpendicular to the feed.
From these examples we can see a machine to mill/drill aluminium needs to be fairly rigid against forces of around 70 - 100N to give a reasonable safety margin.
For drilling the forces act vertically on both the X-rails and the Y-rails and can be considered to be 50% on each. The worst case situation for deflection is where the spindle is in the middle of both X and Y. The Z-axis has to remain stationary under the vertical load which will be determined by the backdrive on the leadscrew and the motor holding torque and any gearing. For a 5mm lead on a 16mm screw that represents a holding torque of 0.11Nm in addition to anything required to hold the Z assembly in place (about the same again for a 9 - 10kg Z assy). The tricky bit is that the deflection of the Y axis is driven by the weight of the Z assy initially until the drill hits the work at which point the cutting force transfers 50/50 to the X and Y rails. If 50% of the cutting force is < the Z assy weight this has the effect of reducing the deflection in Y until that 50% of the cutting force exceeds the ZAssy weight then the Y deflection goes negative (up).
Assume that the X and Y rails are the same diameter for a bed of 1m x 1m with an active work area of 800 x 800mm.
For 30mm end supported rails the deflection in the centre of the Y rails for a 10kg Z assy is .04mm, reducing to .01mm when the zAssy is 100mm from the end of the Y axis. Drilling as per example 1 would reduce the Y deflection to .03mm but introduce deflection of .015mm in the X rails. At the extremity of Y and X the total deflection is around 0.005mm. Therefore 30mm unsupported rails provide within a .05mm accuracy for Z across the entire work area. A similar displacement error in X/Y would be true of example 4. Anything smaller than 30mm is likely to introduce too much error.
With 12mm fully supported rails the deflection is reduced to .001mm assuming that the forces are vertical with regard to the upright of the support. This of course isn't directly true for Y-rails where the rail support is acting as a cantilever. In that respect the 12mm rail would show much a higher deflection as it is only partly constrained by the support. It is much harder to analyse this but even so the deflection of the support alone is less than .005mm
SO.... the outcome of all of that is what we already knew... a 12mm supported rail is infinitely better than 30mm unsupported rails...
and now we know ;-)
Nope because I've been in India the last 10 days and its still sitting on the garage floor waiting for me to make a stand for it...Quote:
Originally Posted by Kip
So, Keith, I'm not sure what you're implying about the theory... as regards your video.. I very much doubt a Dremel can deliver enough power to achieve any of my examples, it certainly needs something more beefy in the order of 300W+...
Sigh...no lube !
Yes i did, how do you atomise the coolant? all the other setups i'v seen they seem to be flooding the cutter with coolant?Quote:
Originally Posted by Kip
Hey guys - coolant mist is OT, take it to another thread.. btw theres a thread on CNCZone about how to do this using a cheap airbrush spray unit and shop compressed air (for those of us with a compressor)...
True, but the calculations are based on real-world laws of physics. I'm not saying certain things are impossible, you can always empirically achieve theoretically diffcult things - like milling Aluminum with a Dremel - but how long will those bearings last, how does the accuracy drop off as the runout increases, how hot does it get before the poor thing melts, etc... There's no harm in understanding the limitations and designing around them...Quote:
Originally Posted by Kip
All I was trying to show was that the fact that 30mm end-supported rail isnt as good as 12mm supported rail under a range of common tasks that a router/mill might be designed for - which we already knew empirically. I agree "suck it and see" is a good teacher, but equally if I don't have the personal experience I don't take someone else's word for it verbatim without some level of research into the issue. :D