Hi guys and gals
I'm Chris from Norfolk.
I newbie who doesn't know much, but don't let that stop you taking the mickey.
Anyway more from me later.
Printable View
Hi guys and gals
I'm Chris from Norfolk.
I newbie who doesn't know much, but don't let that stop you taking the mickey.
Anyway more from me later.
Hi Chris from Norfolk!
Consider yourself welcomed. :-) There's all levels of expertise here and there's no such thing as a stupid question!
:-)
Taking away the CNC element, it might depend on what era you were from? It could be argued that size of the machine, materials or dimensional capabilities denote the difference? Even the method of holding onto the tool or workpiece? But now there's more overlap between them almost every day. 2d, 2.5d. 3d? There's probably exceptions to all those.
Traditional milling machine would be bigger and heavier, certainly used for metals, exclusively hard metals in the machine shops I was in as a lad. (at tea break, you could start reading the paper but you couldn't sit down until the bell went! all dressed in white lab coats too. LOL)
Historically routers were for wood but now you have small milling machines and large routers... both capable of machining many materials...
I'm sure there are other definitions too, depends where you are coming from what facet you see.
Another difference is that a in a router the cutter makes all moves while in a mill the work is moved, principally in the horizontal plane. There are of course many exceptions. Spindle speeds are usually higher in the router.
Russell.
Yes, that blurs the distinction even more.
Of course. In general the materials routers are used for are softer than those mills are used for. Note, I did say in general:-)Quote:
Russell, OT slightly, but would it be fair to say that spindle speed (used) would be determined by the material being worked?
Russell.
Milling machines are used by engineers.
Routers are used by wood butchers.
No exceptions. :barbershop_quartet_