. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Thanks, thats just the picture I needed.

  2. #2
    These controllers are going to be a game changer for the many people sat on the fence telling themselves CNC is too hard to get into.
    John S -

  3. #3
    These look great, what Lathe/Mill Post Processor is required to generate code for them?

    Most similar things I've seen claim "Standard G-Code" but then don't mention which easily available Post Processors produce "Standard G-Code" as all the PPs I've found have a manufacturer/machine/controller designation.

    Mach3 developers had the good grace to work close to a standard for a popular industrial controller rather than a paper standard to which no manufacturer quite adheres.

    Quote Originally Posted by John S View Post
    These controllers are going to be a game changer for the many people sat on the fence telling themselves CNC is too hard to get into.
    Never underestimate the incapability of the masses, there's still all those scary wires to connect ;-)

    - Nick
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by magicniner View Post
    These look great, what Lathe/Mill Post Processor is required to generate code for them?

    Most similar things I've seen claim "Standard G-Code" but then don't mention which easily available Post Processors produce "Standard G-Code" as all the PPs I've found have a manufacturer/machine/controller designation.

    Mach3 developers had the good grace to work close to a standard for a popular industrial controller rather than a paper standard to which no manufacturer quite adheres.



    Never underestimate the incapability of the masses, there's still all those scary wires to connect ;-)

    - Nick

    That's the big question before jumping to conclusions

    What i found till now:


    - Post processor for mach3 definitely does not work, as you could see in second video it runs away from the job coordinates. Who cares, me not. I could save my programs again in the proper format


    -It doe not recognise manual tool change code also. So jobs have to be split. Not big deal

    -Does not recognise G20 and G21, so program must be in mm to begin with. No problem so far.

    -Will run properly G code as of the Gcode and fanuc output from Aspire. Though program was simple. / See video2/ .


    As i have not connected it yet to a machine i can not say more. But there is a good chance that all goes fine.
    project 1 , 2, Dust Shoe ...

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Boyan Silyavski View Post
    -It doe not recognise manual tool change code also.
    Does it support a Tool Changer/Turret etc. ?
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

  6. #6
    This is a basic controller. The much more expensive Chinese controllers not only do all but close the loop also, at least the most expensive ones, which makes them really industrial

    funny, i see now that it supports G20 and G21 but when i was testing it ?, so maybe i made a mistake somehow with the file. Will check again

    That's what it supports.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	g code 1.PNG 
Views:	947 
Size:	201.4 KB 
ID:	19199Click image for larger version. 

Name:	g code 2.PNG 
Views:	839 
Size:	109.2 KB 
ID:	19200
    project 1 , 2, Dust Shoe ...

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by magicniner View Post
    Does it support a Tool Changer/Turret etc. ?

    No and neither does Mach 3 or LinuxCNC without 3rd party boards and a load of tossing about.

    They are basically a cheap foray into CNC without a PC, monitor, licenses etc and all the Mumbo Jumbo that Mach and Linux entail.
    John S -

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by John S View Post
    No and neither does Mach 3 or LinuxCNC without 3rd party boards and a load of tossing about.

    They are basically a cheap foray into CNC without a PC, monitor, licenses etc and all the Mumbo Jumbo that Mach and Linux entail.
    I'm just trying to get a feel for whether it's a direction in which I should move, it does look like a great first foray into CNC solution, but given that I'm already au-fait and comfortable with Mach's Mumbo Jumbo I was looking for a step up rather than a step sideways and possibly down.

    Although I've yet to have a PC fail I have upgraded my controller machine a few times to the point where it will hapily run my CAD/CAM. One very nice feature with Mach3 is that for approximately £60 I am able to have a fully configured, 100% functional backup PC with a new HDD on the shelf and any keyboard or monitor from my other systems can replace the ones on the CNC in the event of failure.

    With any luck these all-in-one boxes will take off in the starter CNC market and grow with their customer base to offer enhanced capabilities,

    - Nick
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. CSLAB CSMIO/IP-M 4-axis Ethernet Motion Controller
    By dudz in forum CS-Lab (CSMIO)
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 02-01-2017, 01:27 AM
  2. FOR SALE: Galil Motion Controller - PCI DMC 1842 - four axes
    By lateAtNight in forum Items For Sale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-06-2014, 03:41 PM
  3. FOR SALE: Galil 1880 8 axis PCI motion controller
    By Boyan Silyavski in forum Items For Sale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-06-2014, 07:39 PM
  4. Advice please! JAF Motion Controller issues!
    By Mark Chard in forum Machine Control Software
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 31-01-2014, 05:03 PM
  5. eBay: Galil DMC-1580 Motion Controller 8-Axis
    By Boyan Silyavski in forum Items On eBay UK
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 25-12-2013, 10:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •