. .

Thread: Freecad

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Can someone give the difference between Freecad and Solidworks ?

  2. #2
    There are differences at every level.
    Solidworks is an integrated commercial product / FreeCad is a collection of bundled Open Source "Apps"
    Solidworks is very expensive / FreeCad is free
    Solidworks is professionally supported / FreeCad is supported by the user group on a forum

    If you want to get into CAD/CAM Fusion 360 is a great product with free licensing to hobby users and startups.
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

  3. #3
    I have used Freecad to generate toolpaths for my homebrew machine as it has an inbuilt postprocessor for LinuxCNC.It works very well for that purpose.It isn't the most intuitive piece of software,but the capabilities are impressive and the price can't be beaten.With just a little more improvement it could knock several expensive software suites into oblivion as they would offer nothing more for the considerable purchase price.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by routerdriver View Post
    With just a little more improvement it could knock several expensive software suites into oblivion as they would offer nothing more for the considerable purchase price.
    You could say the same of LinuxCNC regarding controllers, but it doesn't, and it won't.

    Development by nerd committee, when they are not competent, driven, productive machinists themselves never yields optimal results.

    This is why Tormach had to spend their own money to develop LinuxCNC into a usable product for non-nerds, PathPilot.
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

  5. #5
    To an extent I agree with that comment and my previous post said it needed just a bit more development.The Freecad forum is quite a good place to ask questions and there is a steady stream of developments which are often well presented on youtube and there are others on youtube which needed editing and critiquing before being posted as they say very little over rather too much time.

    The comments about LinuxCNC are probably a little harsh as there is a nucleus of very well informed people developing the platform.Again,documentation is a bit indigestible and often more accessible from a good youtube video.I'm just happy that people are improving these systems and sharing them with us and would be even happier if the documentation was improved at the same rate.A benevolent technical author or editor would earn a lot of thanks.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by routerdriver View Post
    I have used Freecad to generate toolpaths for my homebrew machine as it has an inbuilt postprocessor for LinuxCNC.It works very well for that purpose.It isn't the most intuitive piece of software,but the capabilities are impressive and the price can't be beaten.With just a little more improvement it could knock several expensive software suites into oblivion as they would offer nothing more for the considerable purchase price.
    I have been using Freecad for almost two years now and I think it is an excellent software, once you get over the top of the steep learning curve. As you say, it isn't the most intuitive software, but I find the parametrized way of handling design extremely useful, especially when changes are needed to be made, or want to have high accuracy.

    However, I use it exclusively for my 3D printer model designs, but never really managed to create anything for CNC. I guess that's my own fault for not spending enough time to learn how to do it, but I never managed to create any g-code for milling. 3D printing works fine, as a two step g-code generation, first to stl and then to g-code via slic3r. I can of course generate 2D dxf file and them manually, using DXF to G-code (another freeware) generate the g-code, but it is complicated and pocketing is not working for me, so I find that I might as well use other software tools for milling. I wish I could do it in Freecad, but I just can't seem to get it how to do it.

  7. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to A_Camera For This Useful Post:


  8. #7
    I found this video very helpful https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4JUnB1AHdY .The more recent series on Path topics from sliptonic was also very useful.It also helps that there is a post processor for my controller bundled with Freecad.I am increasingly impressed by the most recent developments in 3D surfacing and pocketing and hope to try using them in the next few days.There are some clever people donating their work to the project and I am thankful that they do so.

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to routerdriver For This Useful Post:


  10. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by routerdriver View Post
    I found this video very helpful https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4JUnB1AHdY .The more recent series on Path topics from sliptonic was also very useful.It also helps that there is a post processor for my controller bundled with Freecad.I am increasingly impressed by the most recent developments in 3D surfacing and pocketing and hope to try using them in the next few days.There are some clever people donating their work to the project and I am thankful that they do so.
    Thanks for the link. It seems that my version is crashing for circular pockets. Tried to find some solution, but nothing seems to work. There also seems to be quite a few "dialects", even if 0.17 is the latest version. Mine is still 0.16 and I will see if updating to the last version helps, but a some googling says that there is still a bug.

    Edit:
    0.17 seems to work well at least on the computer I have tested.
    Last edited by A_Camera; 13-03-2019 at 08:02 PM.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to A_Camera For This Useful Post:


  12. #9
    Unfortunately, even FreeCAD 0.17 has some serious limitations regarding the use for CNC designs.

    https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/62431594

    https://forum.freecadweb.org/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=34953

    Those are just a few bugs or shortcomings I have detected during the one day I tested it. Unfortunately, those render FreeCAD useless for milling, except for some simple work. It is however excellent (in my opinion) for 3D modelling items which are 3D printed.

  13. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to A_Camera For This Useful Post:


  14. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by routerdriver View Post
    I found this video very helpful https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4JUnB1AHdY .The more recent series on Path topics from sliptonic was also very useful.It also helps that there is a post processor for my controller bundled with Freecad.
    Which controller is that may I ask please?

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Voicecoil For This Useful Post:


Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. CamBam / FreeCAD 2D/3D MOP question Please help
    By dudz in forum CAD & CAM Software
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 30-08-2014, 09:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •