. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    In both scenarios you need a way to adjust the width of the gantry as you will be "trapping" either the ballnut or both ballnut and linear bearings.

    If you have the rail on top it can be adjusted sideways in the screwdown moment.

    For the ballnut you can mount it like that if you shim it..

    Skickat från min SM-G955F via Tapatalk

  2. #2
    Top one will most likely be stiffer as you are not bending the gantry sides. Limiting factor is the gauge of the extrusions on the bed sides. If space and access to the bed at each end allows you can plate over the ends to join them to each other.
    Building a CNC machine to make a better one since 2010 . . .
    MK1 (1st photo), MK2, MK3, MK4

  3. #3
    I'll go for the top one so, I wasn't thinking that it could have any bending problem, thanks.

    Limiting factor is the gauge of the extrusions on the bed sides.
    I'm not sure to understand it. Do you mean the extrusion is it too high?

    Good idea for the end plat, do you think 5mm aluminium is enough to do it?

    I found this documentation about hiwin rails : http://www.hiwin.com/pdf/linear_guideways.pdf
    It can be interesting for someone. Is it a good choice to have a HGW (wide flange carriage) could be a good choice for the Y axis for example? And HGH for X and Z axis.

    Any advice higly appreciated.

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by BriceO View Post
    I'll go for the top one so, I wasn't thinking that it could have any bending problem, thanks.


    I'm not sure to understand it. Do you mean the extrusion is it too high?

    Good idea for the end plat, do you think 5mm aluminium is enough to do it?

    I found this documentation about hiwin rails : http://www.hiwin.com/pdf/linear_guideways.pdf
    It can be interesting for someone. Is it a good choice to have a HGW (wide flange carriage) could be a good choice for the Y axis for example? And HGH for X and Z axis.

    Any advice higly appreciated.
    The extrusion is not too high all I wanted to point out was that using extrusion, especially thin wall (gauge) extrusion, will be the limiting factor for the stiffness. The wall is thin, and it essentially has lots of deep slots cut in it. Imagine pressing sideways where the gantry rail is situated, and imagine how it will want to bend and vibrate.

    Lost of people use steel box section instead as it is much stiffer, with a continuous outer section, usually with a high wall thickness (to allow thread tapping), and it is cheaper.

    End plates of 5mm will be fine as shear panels don't need to be massively thick to be effective, but it will limit feed in / out access if that is a consideration.

    Hiwin carriages - either wide or narrow are both fine. Use wide if that gives a better footprint and mounting for your design.
    Building a CNC machine to make a better one since 2010 . . .
    MK1 (1st photo), MK2, MK3, MK4

  5. #5
    Thanks, is it the same problem for the Y axis? Should I place the rails on top and bottom or is it fine?

    To be honest, I can't really imagine how it will bend and vibrate. I was thinking that the weight/force is supported by all the length of the extrusion.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by BriceO View Post
    Thanks, is it the same problem for the Y axis? Should I place the rails on top and bottom or is it fine?

    To be honest, I can't really imagine how it will bend and vibrate. I was thinking that the weight/force is supported by all the length of the extrusion.
    Yes it is, but, the ends are fixed - the weight/force now tries to act upon the whole beam but cannot move the ends as they are fixed - it will then act upon the point where the force is applied, if say it is applied centrally then the force will try and bend or push the beam in the opposite direction to the force - the beam will bend. The skill in designing beams is to transmit those forces to the ends of the beam without letting it bend - this is done by using heavy enough section material or bracing thinner section material with struts or triangular trusses.

    Vibration is the same really, just many more, smaller forces that need dampening out or preventing in the first place - mass is a good way of stopping vibration or at least moving the harmonic point to somewhere outside the range of expected vibrations.

  7. #7
    Thanks for these explanations, I used the Item site to calculate deflection of the profile (http://product.item24.co.uk/en/home/...ral-41665.html) for 1200mm and 400N. If I do it right I have a deflection of ~0.01 mm.
    I was thinking that Aluminium was a good compromise between weight/strength and offer a good flatness. I don't have enough experience to determine how bad is it.

    Sadly, I already have these "light" profiles. Should I go for steel box section instead for X and Y? Do you have any advice plz?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Aluminium profile cnc build
    By valdis034 in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 21-02-2023, 02:27 PM
  2. Aluminium Profile - ValuFrame?
    By Tenson in forum Marketplace Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 24-09-2020, 07:21 PM
  3. Aluminium Profile
    By amxen in forum Metalwork Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13-08-2015, 07:37 PM
  4. eBay: KB Aluminium Profile Supplies
    By KB Aluminium in forum Items On eBay UK
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 20-05-2015, 03:46 PM
  5. Tapping Aluminium profile
    By jonbabbz in forum Tool & Tooling Technology
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-05-2012, 08:09 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •