. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    UC300ETH + UB1 + UCCNC license = $380 US.

    Closer feature wise to the IP-S than the IP-M.
    And the macros always work.


    That looks ok, I'm a bit confused about the LPT part - if its ethernet, how can it be LPT??
    The LPT is just the way the pins are configured. They match a parallel port pinout, so that just about any breakout board will plug right into it.
    Gerry
    ______________________________________________
    UCCNC 2022 Screenset

    Mach3 2010 Screenset

    JointCAM - CAM for Woodworking Joints

  2. #2
    Its a 5LPT board with ethernet connection? So you would use 5 BOB's too get full functionality??

    Just guessing, couldn't see a UB1 win the site ;)


    Edit,
    typing at same time ;)

    Makes sense now, I still prefer the CSMIO if not just for its "completeness" and rugged build.
    Last edited by Davek0974; 03-01-2018 at 04:42 PM.

  3. #3
    "Full Functionality" would depend on the users needs. And there are 1 port, 2 port, and 3 port breakout boards. The UB1 uses 3 of the ports.
    http://www.cncroom.com/interface-cards/uc300eth-ub1

    You don't need the 5LPT board with the UB1, so you save a few bucks there.


    Makes sense now, I still prefer the CSMIO if not just for its "completeness" and rugged build.
    But it relies on flawed software, which is the main issue.
    Last edited by Ger21; 03-01-2018 at 05:34 PM.
    Gerry
    ______________________________________________
    UCCNC 2022 Screenset

    Mach3 2010 Screenset

    JointCAM - CAM for Woodworking Joints

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Ger21 View Post

    But it relies on flawed software, which is the main issue.
    Yes its one drawback and i have worked around it, I guess i could ask CSLABS if they have done anything on it as the linked stuff was a while back, doubtful though which is a pity IMHO.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Davek0974 View Post
    I guess i could ask CSLABS if they have done anything on it
    About as likely as retrofitting the dual-motor support from the IP-S into the IP-M, more's the pity.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •