. .

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #15
    Quote Originally Posted by JAZZCNC View Post
    Yes that's the idea thou wouldn't fasten between those two gantry uprights as it will make setting up difficult with little room for error.
    Fasten rails on front, ballscrews on side and put brace between gantry uprights at top. Connect two ballscrews with belt and single motor running along top of brace.
    Put rails on front of gantry and ballscrew on top.
    Dean,

    I've been thinking about this a bit, and been through different iterations of a design for the gantry, as always trying to work out the best compromise. Most recently I've been measuring the width of the shed door opening - I don't want a machine that I have to dismantle to get in/out of the shed.

    Can I pick your brains on the following - it does, I think, have problems but I simply don't know if they are problems that I need to be worried about.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2018-03-04 at 14.45.58.png 
Views:	297 
Size:	975.5 KB 
ID:	23872

    My concern is the projection of the spindle substantially away from the rails.

    For info: Y-Axis beam is 80x120x5 box steel. Uprights are 100x100x5. Braces and bottom skids 100x50x4 . Sizes chosen on the "big is good" rule of thumb but also with a mind towards availability and ease of mounting stuff. Shiny stuff is 15mm alu tool plate. There's imaginary bracketry involved tbd. Of course there'd be a brace across the top, made from similar big-steel.

    The obvious solution for the projection is to place the spindle assembly on the other side of the Y-gantry (this was my previous design), but I have a real-life constraint (the shed door width, and sensibly the amount of real-estate that this can take up) that means I'd seriously compromise the available space in the Y-plane (this current design obviously impacts the X-axis a bit - but I can tolerate that more than the Y).

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Screen Shot 2018-03-04 at 14.48.48.png 
Views:	248 
Size:	950.2 KB 
ID:	23877

    Kind of shows the impact having the ball screws on the inner face gives me. There's also another issue that the (invisible) top-brace then impacts the available Z-height with the spindle impacting the brace (something I can bodge around somewhat inelegantly by offsetting the brace).

    I have looked at replacing the Y-Axis with just a big block of tool plate (20mm), but the deflection calculators suggested a pretty terrible performance by comparison to box section.

    My real question is one of opinion - of whether the spindle offset will impact the performance enough to make this design impractical - if you have any thoughts I'd appreciate them.
    Last edited by Doddy; 04-03-2018 at 04:37 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BUILD LOG: Desktop size steel welded router 3 axis
    By Tom J in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 28-03-2017, 09:36 PM
  2. building with steel tubing pre-welded plates with holes doable?
    By reefy86 in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 14-09-2016, 03:26 PM
  3. 600x900 Steel welded router build
    By embraced in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-10-2014, 10:55 PM
  4. FOR SALE: Strong steel welded base with ground flat surface.
    By black5f in forum Items For Sale
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14-01-2012, 07:20 PM
  5. Bench Top Mill
    By Wobblybootie in forum Milling Machines, Builds & Conversions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 06:57 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •