. .

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #33
    Quote Originally Posted by Doddy View Post
    I think I have 5 of the ones that you linked to sitting in a corner collecting dust... will check tonight and if they are, and my memory serves me correctly, will post a photo or two. There might be justifiable caution to buying from our Chinese friends.
    Ah yes, I have a number of these, advertised as TB6600s but which are, in fact, TB67S109AFTG drivers.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1951.jpg 
Views:	1015 
Size:	170.8 KB 
ID:	23772

    Taking one apart...

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1953.jpg 
Views:	1018 
Size:	210.6 KB 
ID:	23773

    No TB6600, but on the rear....

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_1954.jpg 
Views:	958 
Size:	245.8 KB 
ID:	23774

    A tiny QFN package, pasted to a bit of a heatsink that is then coupled to a secondary heatsink.

    After you've been caught once with these, spotting them is pretty easy. For one thing - they advertise a 32 micro step, which isn't supported by the TB6600 (only 16 micro steps).

    There's some discussion online that supports these as a reasonable alternative to the TB6600s, but you need to read the data sheets and understand each on their own merits. Personally, I think the thermal solution on these is poor - you could end up with the chip shutting down under load. The R(on) is 20% higher than a 6600 (that's a bad thing that exacerbates the thermal solution). The max clock is 100kHz - doesn't sound bad unless your using 32 micro steps (then it's 100,000 / 32 microsteps / 200 steps/revolution stepper = 15.625 revs/sec, or 937.5RPM max out of the stepper (the 6600 is rated at 200kHz, and only supports 16 micro steps). Lower working voltage and lower drive current (4A vs 5A). Although rated upto 50V worryingly the 67S109 data sheet gives typical characteristics at 24V.

    I bought them, and they didn't work well for me (missing steps), but my replacements (TB6600s) also had similar problems that needed the optoisolators updating. I'm not saying they're good, or bad, but different to that advertised.
    Last edited by Doddy; 15-02-2018 at 07:17 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Fill in my knowledge gap :)
    By Davek0974 in forum CamBam
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 02-02-2017, 02:55 PM
  2. Power supply understanding
    By smeg up in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-02-2015, 07:07 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 14-07-2014, 03:28 PM
  4. Understanding the bearing block
    By Rogue in forum Rails, Guideways & Bearings
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 28-08-2011, 03:14 PM
  5. Some great DIY clamping setups
    By Yohudi in forum Computer Software
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 22-01-2009, 06:54 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •