-
02-02-2019 #21
-
02-02-2019 #22
The co-ord stuff and scaling is sometimes iffy.
Mostly, it is not wrong, necessarily.
If the machine was set up with a certain abs. position, homed, then you use a different offset g54xx, it is unclear which units should be used.
Since the work co-ords are not tied to a scalar, how is the sw to know what is/was the correct offset base in global terms.
If a work co-ord is offset say 10,0 mm, and I switch to imperial, should the offset base adjust by /25.4. Why ?
Likewise, should the machine global values adjust, or not ?
Why ?
If the home switch in z is offset 10.000- mm in z, metric, and I switch to imperial, should the home-pos value adjust ?
If I read in the value into a parameter say #3000, should that number adjust ?
Why ?
I am NOT saying it is right, logical, correct.
What I am pointing out is that it is very complex with no clear right answers, mostly.
The UCxxx, and the chinese offline controllers, are mostly much less complex and donīt support a lot of the features in gcode.
-
02-02-2019 #23
Good call Clive!
I rarely think of the basic machine set up being at fault! :DYou think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D
-
The Following User Says Thank You to magicniner For This Useful Post:
-
02-02-2019 #24
I got it figured out! It was an extra decimal point. i.e step per was set 2000.xxx instead of 200.xxx
I guess, I assumed the step per start at 1600 and goes up.
Appreciate your help, everyone!
Now the step per is resolved, I need help to figure out why everything except square, rectangle, and straight lines come up deformed.
The shapes below were supposed to be 20mm circle, and 20x20x20mm triangle.
Last edited by CnCAbc; 02-02-2019 at 10:25 PM.
-
02-02-2019 #25Now the step per is resolved, I need help to figure out why everything except square, rectangle, and straight lines come up deformed.
Glad you got the steps per right now.Last edited by Clive S; 02-02-2019 at 11:05 PM.
..Clive
The more you know, The better you know, How little you know
-
02-02-2019 #26
-
03-02-2019 #27
Well you was sure the steps were fine before. Post a pic. of the machine also what drives and what is the voltage supplying them. What is the acceleration settings in Mach.
Have you measured if the actual distance is the same for X100 and Y100
We don't have crystal balls to see these things...Clive
The more you know, The better you know, How little you know
-
03-02-2019 #28
-
The Following User Says Thank You to magicniner For This Useful Post:
-
03-02-2019 #29
-
03-02-2019 #30
I give you this one! I will double check everything and post pictures by tomorrow.
Don't tell me the crystal ball I recently purchased from the pawn shop was yours? lol
Thanks for taking the time to help!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Weird Mach3 + CSMIO/IP-M Probe Problem
By matt-b2 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 24Last Post: 11-07-2019, 01:05 PM -
The best CAD/CAM suggestion, Gcode and Mach3
By petes in forum CAD & CAM SoftwareReplies: 1Last Post: 29-01-2015, 11:06 AM -
Help needed for a 3d part gcode for mach3
By Rebekah_harper in forum Computer SoftwareReplies: 33Last Post: 04-11-2013, 01:55 AM -
Mach3 Using a physical button to repeat current gcode
By RLKS Rob in forum Artsoft Mach (3 & 4)Replies: 2Last Post: 12-08-2012, 01:30 PM -
Day shift Manual Miller/Night Shift Turner and Grinder Required - Berkshire
By J Maynard in forum Opportunities Available & SoughtReplies: 0Last Post: 06-01-2012, 11:46 AM
Bookmarks