. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Thanks for the replies and advice chaps. Seems to me that since I want turning, UCCNC is out. For Acorn you have to buy the controller and the software. Planet CNC looks quite attractive as it does turning as well as milling. My offset macros automatically calibrate turning tools and populate the tool table, so can't do that in CAM. LinuxCNC has a limited choice of motion controllers. I want to get better pulsing performance anyway so a motion controller looks a good option. I really don't want to keep buying replacement XP PCs especially if it perpetuates the Mach3 limitations. Anyway I'm tired of puzzling out the c**p documentation. So a bit further forward, useful information, thanks!

  2. #2
    I agree, you shouldn't carry on with XP, both W7 and W10 are better but if you want to carry on using Mach3 with parallel ports then you are limited to W7 32 bits, but if you want a better PC and a motion controller then you can also use W10 64 bits. All of the UC motion controllers can be used with Mach3, you don't need UCCNC if it is not working for you.

  3. #3
    m_c's Avatar
    Lives in East Lothian, United Kingdom. Last Activity: 1 Day Ago Forum Superstar, has done so much to help others, they deserve a medal. Has a total post count of 2,992. Received thanks 376 times, giving thanks to others 9 times.
    Turn does limit choice, as it's a relatively small slice of the CNC market, compared to mills/routers/plasma cutters etc which all operate in a very similar way.

    I'm pretty sure the UC motion controllers (or it might be Pokeys - I can remember a discussion over on the Yahoo Mach group a while back about multislot threading...), and the PMDX controllers support turn, but you'd have to use some flavour of Mach.
    CS-Labs supports turn, but you have to use their fully featured controllers, along with an MPG module for threading IIRC, and again you're limited to Mach at the present time.
    Smoothsteppers also support turn, but again are Mach only.
    Dynomotion KFlop would give you the option of Mach3 or KMotionCNC (it's free), which is what I personally use, but it would be reliant on you adding an encoder for threading. I originally ran with a KFlop and Mach3, as KMotionCNC at the time didn't have much support for turn, but after yet another Mach3 glitch, I moved to KMotionCNC a few years ago, and it's been flawless (more than which can be said about the operator..).

    Then you're into standalone controllers.

    It really depends on how much you're willing to spend, and how much re-wiring you're willing to do.
    Avoiding the rubbish customer service from AluminiumWarehouse since July '13.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Mach 3 Help
    By RichardR in forum Artsoft Mach (3 & 4)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-08-2016, 12:21 PM
  2. RFQ: Triac / Mach 3 help
    By suesi34e in forum Projects, Jobs & Requests
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-08-2013, 01:59 PM
  3. NCStudio or Mach 3 or something else?
    By Fivetide in forum Machine Control Software
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-09-2012, 05:41 PM
  4. mach 3 help
    By 1albobs in forum Artsoft Mach (3 & 4)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 27-02-2012, 03:34 PM
  5. MACH 2008
    By Lee Roberts in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-10-2007, 09:48 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •