. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Hi John
    Do you have a link to a cheap digital microscope, we used to use the Taylor Hobson kit @ work but there are no cheap options that i know of.
    Regards
    Mike

  2. #2
    Hi mike

    I also have a Taylor Hobson alignment telescope, not the digital just the older optical model, It is quite a fiddle to set it up and once set if it is knocked it will go out of alignment, having to set the targets and keep checking is slow.

    I restored a lathe a while back and used wire, it was a Heidenreich and Harbeck 20 Ro 2.4 metres between centres. to check the straightness of the bed I attached the wire along the side of the bed level with the top of the V's and used an optical microscope. not fancy just a student microscope. the wire was firmly attached and did not need to be constantly checked it never went out of alignment being firmly bolted in position. The microscope was attached to a stage that was guided by the V ways was fixed over the wire and positioned with a Mitutoyo micrometer stem (They are available to be built into an instrument). error readings were taken with the micrometer after positioning the microscope over the wire. it worked very well.

    I later purchased a cheap USB microscope About 40AUD it came with software. regrettably I lent it out and it never returned! Hmmm.

    So I also need to buy a new one too with cross hair measurement software.
    The trouble is there are hundreds of models available for a few quid.

    Maybe someone in here has purchased one and can report on it?

    Regards
    john
    Last edited by John McNamara; 03-02-2019 at 01:10 PM.

  3. #3
    Hi John
    Thanks for your reply, since i have been thinking about the rail alignment issue i have wanted to go with optical alignment as this seems the best way to do it, but the cost of a Scope/targets ect makes it a none starter. if i had still been working i could have borrowed the kit from work. will look into USB microscope idea.
    Regards
    Mike

  4. #4
    Found a photo of the setup I mentioned, it was just a lashup for a one off, it worked well. Note the bolted on wire support and adjustment unit

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4-02-2019 1-01-41 AM.jpg 
Views:	442 
Size:	218.1 KB 
ID:	25421
    Last edited by John McNamara; 03-02-2019 at 03:09 PM.

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John McNamara For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by John McNamara View Post
    Found a photo of the setup I mentioned, it was just a lashup for a one off, it worked well. Note the bolted on wire support and adjustment unit

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4-02-2019 1-01-41 AM.jpg 
Views:	442 
Size:	218.1 KB 
ID:	25421
    I was digging a bit deeper in the wire alignment. It sounds quite interesting as I said. previous. I am considering that in our days even a smartphone camera should do the trick. In my case I can go as close as 7cm without loosing focus. one pixel takes then the picture of a 0,015 mm square. One thing I would be interested in if you could explain the construction for the support of the wire. More in detail. As I see it as difficult to keep it in place.

    Further I was reading an article where they recommended to use "stainless steel “down rigger” (fishing line) wire, rated at 150 lb" as this would be better then piano wire.
    http://fwrc.msstate.edu/southernsaw/alignment1.pdf

    But to pull it that hard with 75% force I would need a very rigid support.

  7. #6
    Johns post gives the weight for the required tensioning of the wire, ie 75% of breaking strain. wire is fixed solid @ one end and run via a pulley @ the other with the weight attached. Had a look on ebay and the USB microscopes are as cheap as chips.
    Regards
    Mike

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by mekanik View Post
    Johns post gives the weight for the required tensioning of the wire, ie 75% of breaking strain. wire is fixed solid @ one end and run via a pulley @ the other with the weight attached. Had a look on ebay and the USB microscopes are as cheap as chips.
    Regards
    Mike
    But in the article I am referring to they recommend to use sloted adjustment nuts. And a winch instead of weights. I mean from this 150lb wire 75% is a lot of force pulling on the pulley. Also I would expect that a pulley has a lot of play.

    Sure for the usb microscope I am not arguing because of the price but the quality. As I am expecting it to have a really bad image sensor for that price.

    But I am still trying to fully understand the method they are using in the article.
    http://fwrc.msstate.edu/southernsaw/alignment1.pdf
    Last edited by feldah; 09-02-2019 at 04:39 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. A4 Reference Chart Storage
    By magicniner in forum Workshop & Equipment
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-06-2016, 05:54 PM
  2. Establisihing reference for rail alignment
    By tropostudio in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 14-05-2015, 08:28 PM
  3. Good tooling catalogue to calculate feed and speed
    By hoezap in forum Tool & Tooling Technology
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-02-2013, 01:12 PM
  4. Uneven cut
    By Jonni Toobad in forum Machine Discussion
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-10-2012, 06:18 AM
  5. Schematic Symbol Reference
    By Lee Roberts in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23-01-2008, 03:23 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •