Threaded View
-
02-12-2019 #6
This is a complex topic, but you ultimately seek to control displacement. At higher frequencies the displacement for a given input level will be lower. The methods of increasing damping you mention are largely velocity dependent, so will be more effective at higher frequencies (as Voicecoil said), so you still want stiffness to push those frequencies up.
Arguing stiffness vs. damping in a pure sense is meaningless, but as I said before, adding stiffness (and I really should also say mass) is easy, and should intuitively make sense in limiting system response. Trying to engineer in damping usually means allowing relative motion of elements of the system somehow, which undermines keeping it stiff.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Fusion 360
By Clive S in forum General DiscussionReplies: 11Last Post: 17-10-2019, 08:19 AM -
NC Programming and Simulation Specialist in Bristol
By Mud in forum Opportunities Available & SoughtReplies: 0Last Post: 24-04-2019, 08:46 PM -
Fusion 360 - best approach?
By routercnc in forum Fusion 360Replies: 10Last Post: 18-06-2016, 07:49 AM -
I just Found Camotics CNC Simulation
By magicniner in forum Computer SoftwareReplies: 5Last Post: 14-06-2016, 09:13 AM -
Leadshine EM / AM Anti Resonance & Current Loop Tuning
By CNCStudent in forum Motor Drivers & ControllersReplies: 0Last Post: 05-03-2015, 04:01 PM
Bookmarks