Hybrid View
-
17-01-2020 #1
Here we go again.! . . . Have you ever built or used a belt-driven machine.?
For a small router, (or even a basic large machine) then belt drive is a very good solution with high efficiency and low backlash that's reasonably cheap and easy. Yes, maybe not ball screw good but much better than other methods like R&P or cheap lead screws if done correctly. . . . .Don't knock it until you've tried it.!Last edited by JAZZCNC; 18-01-2020 at 11:05 AM.
-
20-01-2020 #2
Here we go again, my first machine was belt driven and aint nothing bad with it, just learn how belt stretches on each material and each temperature... Of course you will say if properly calculated will not happen and i will tell you that for same price it could be ball screw.
Why don't you relax and stop supervising me what i say, it's just an opinion. I am not pretending like you to be the final word on everything
-
20-01-2020 #3
We do agree that ballscrews are better and not much more money. But I don't agree with telling someone NOT to use them with a statement like "God forbid a belt driven machine." because they are not that bad when done correctly with correctly sized belts. It's a perfectly good route for a first time builder on a budget who doesn't want to get into importing ballscrews etc from China.
I don't pretend to be the final word on everything.! . . . .I AM THE FINAL WORD. . .
Chill out Boyan, I still Luv ya Dude, and it's only for the sake of others we do what we do.!
-
20-01-2020 #4
Another thing to think about is I am 100% guaranteeing that any machine you design and build will end up getting modified in some way after you get your first cut chips.
I think I spent the first year either pulling my machine apart and making minor alterations like packing the interior of the extrusion and bolting the gantry beams together to increase rigidity and reduce harmonics, to bigger alterations like removing the old Z axis and replacing it with a stronger C beam and replacing the aluminium gantry uprights with strong steel ones. This reduced a LOT of design problems with my original build yet I’m still not 100% happy.
What I mean is, until you get some experience under your belt it’s hard to know what you want from what you NEED to make your machine do what you want. I’m still very much a novice yet have managed to improve my machine a lot over the last few years.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 17 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 17 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Academic research on CAM CAD software/ Help please
By lorenzo0572 in forum CAD & CAM SoftwareReplies: 3Last Post: 03-05-2014, 11:08 AM
Bookmarks