NordicCNC's build log

[jarjar]

Nordic has stated he wants a 'good' surface finish in Aluminium, which really he should be using a mill style machine for - so I see where you're coming from there, but again, define 'good'.

A "mill style" machine doesn't mean anything. The style of structure (C-frame, fixed gantry, moving gantry, ...) of a machine has nothing to do with its capabilities. Some are just easier to make stiff than others.

... Why? This size is about standard for most of the build logs. Huge for a mill, still quite a small router. 1500kg? I think mines about 500kg... Sure added weight helps dampen vibration and makes sense, but there isn't any reason it must weigh that much. And hey - if its on rollers who cares? Lift and move with jacks.

Just some number I have in mind when someone tells me he wants to build a 8000€ router this size to do aluminium work. A Datron with similar working area is 2.5t for comparison. Stiffness comes with weight when using standard material (metal).

That seems like a terrible reason to spend more money. A standard clearance hole for M5 gives you 0.5mm of wiggle. By marking out carefully, setting up the rails with clamps and a dial guage, then using a transfer punch, this is more than enough.

Indeed I was wrong about that. The clearance is the same for M6 bolts. Still the price difference is low and bigger is always better for rails... It helps for stiffness, ballscrew clearance, and the rails are better supported when mounted on T-slots profiles.

@NordicCNC
You still need a 32mm ballscrew at 1500rpm and 10mm pitch for 1400mm travel. Calculator for critical speed.