. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Thanks for the input, most appreciated.

    The mono stable and astable idea sounds good but beyond my capabilites so I will have to wait for your input
    I found a circuit that uses a 555 to pull vref down after 10s, its from a unipolar design that uses an L297 so i presumed it would be ok.

    I'm not sure if I fully understand the timing delay, I presumed that the control circuit would activate the lower vref so soon as the clock stopped? but looking at this I think it only works after 10s of inactivity. so in most cases the current will be full power?
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Adj Vref.png 
Views:	1462 
Size:	6.5 KB 
ID:	1128  

  2. Quote Originally Posted by Ross77 View Post
    Thanks for the input, most appreciated.

    The mono stable and astable idea sounds good but beyond my capabilites so I will have to wait for your input
    I found a circuit that uses a 555 to pull vref down after 10s, its from a unipolar design that uses an L297 so i presumed it would be ok.

    I'm not sure if I fully understand the timing delay, I presumed that the control circuit would activate the lower vref so soon as the clock stopped? but looking at this I think it only works after 10s of inactivity. so in most cases the current will be full power?
    The delay could be made adjustable, but that circuit would do the trick. It needs a lot more parts than the PIC, that is the attraction of using the PIC...

    I dont think a PIC program would be hard to create, using a 16F84 or equivalent...they are only a few pence now and programming them isn't hard (I can do it, so can at least 2 or 3 others)

  3. #3
    Thanks Irving, Is that an offer to create the code? :clap:

    I have a programmer that I bought many years ago, but never built, that supports that chip. So the final decision is wether to include the short cuircuit protection as it dose complicate the board a tad. Is it really worth the hassel? I first thought it was also an internal overload but after finding the application sheet it is only for output short circuit, maybe I'll just have to be carefull with the motor wiring :whistling:

  4. Quote Originally Posted by Ross77 View Post
    Thanks Irving, Is that an offer to create the code? :clap:

    I have a programmer that I bought many years ago, but never built, that supports that chip. So the final decision is wether to include the short cuircuit protection as it dose complicate the board a tad. Is it really worth the hassel? I first thought it was also an internal overload but after finding the application sheet it is only for output short circuit, maybe I'll just have to be carefull with the motor wiring :whistling:

    I'll have a think on it...

    Which bit of short circuit prtection?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 11 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 11 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 16-03-2014, 07:29 PM
  2. Dc servo driver
    By Treemonkey in forum Motor Drivers & Controllers
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 11-02-2013, 08:16 PM
  3. Driver suggestions
    By Shinobiwan in forum Motor Drivers & Controllers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-03-2012, 03:54 PM
  4. Driver wiring help...
    By mike in forum Motor Drivers & Controllers
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 21-09-2010, 09:29 AM
  5. Driver box
    By John S in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-06-2009, 12:46 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •