. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    m_c's Avatar
    Lives in East Lothian, United Kingdom. Last Activity: 3 Hours Ago Forum Superstar, has done so much to help others, they deserve a medal. Has a total post count of 2,992. Received thanks 376 times, giving thanks to others 9 times.
    That's a bit rubbish if you can't use a step/dir output to control a spindle.

    Other options to look at that would be a direct plugin to a parallel port, would be the CNCDrive UC100, or the PMDX-411 (which is Mach 4 only).
    If you're wanting to rewire and do away with the parallel port, there are a lot of other options.
    Avoiding the rubbish customer service from AluminiumWarehouse since July '13.

  2. #2
    JimG's Avatar
    Lives in Bristol, United Kingdom. Last Activity: 09-12-2025 Has been a member for 9-10 years. Has a total post count of 6.
    Quote Originally Posted by m_c View Post
    That's a bit rubbish if you can't use a step/dir output to control a spindle.

    Other options to look at that would be a direct plugin to a parallel port, would be the CNCDrive UC100, or the PMDX-411 (which is Mach 4 only).
    If you're wanting to rewire and do away with the parallel port, there are a lot of other options.
    I'm not too keen to do a re-wire and using the existing parallel port would be my preference. When I got the KX1, the information about the machine's electronic guts was pretty well non-existant - a block diagram of the inter-component wiring being the sum total. So I'm reluctant to delve further into that in case it just raises more problems.

    I've looked at the UC100 and also the Warp9 ESS. I've researched both as much as I can and I might plump for the ESS since that appears to have a lot more documentation about interfacing with Mach3. I'm quite happy with Mach3 since the majority of my work is fairly straightforward 2.5D work out of Cut2D and Mach3 has given me no problems with that, so upgrading to Mach4 is an expense I would hope to avoid. The late John Stevenson also ran a support forum for the Seig CNC mills and I think I remember the Smoothstepper being discussed as a suitable upgrade, although the forum has now gone so I can't refer back to it.

    Jim

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Looking for parallel port cable
    By eurikain in forum Computer Hardware
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 20-02-2016, 01:51 AM
  2. CSMIO/IP-M vs Ethernet SmoothStepper (Begone foul parallel port!)
    By Greeny in forum Control Hardware & Systems
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 14-11-2013, 11:59 PM
  3. parallel port address
    By Dan Brown in forum Artsoft Mach (3 & 4)
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 07-01-2010, 12:04 PM
  4. Which USB parallel port emulator is the best
    By bruce_miranda in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 18-09-2008, 03:38 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •