Hybrid View
-
02-10-2010 #1
Great work! Thanks for sharing.
I really am surprised at the figures for IBeam. With industrial stock ... eg 100mm Width / 200mm Height / 10mm thickness upper + lower plates, 7mm thickness of upright.
Comparing it to 12mm thick Plate, 200mm height
and RHS 120 x 80 x 3
Ive placed 120x80x3 2m length between two RSJs and stood on its middle and bounced, observing its considerable flex.
I've done the same with a 2.2m RSJ (100x200x10) and done my best tigger impression but observed little if any movement.
but the spreadsheet indicates the opposite should be observed:
DEFLECTION: 31micros vs 2micros (RSJ vs RHS)
TORSIONAL STIFFNESS: 28,000 vs 1,800,000 (RSJ vs RHS)Last edited by williamturner1; 02-10-2010 at 03:25 PM.
-
04-10-2010 #2
Hi williamturner1
You might be reading off the wrong rows.
I've compared the 2 shape:
'I beam' width 100mm, depth 200mm, flange 10mm, web 7mm
RHS width 120mm, depth 80mm, wall 3mm
Assuming length 2000mm, and your weight 60kg, and vertical Z deflections are:
I beam 23 microns
RHS 393 microns
Which tallies with your jumping experiment, showing the vertical stiffness difference, where the I beam is much stiffer.
Unless you had a lever arm to jump on (which was very stiff), then you would not be comparing the torsional performance which I would expect to be worse for the I beam.
-
23-05-2018 #3
Thanks for sharing your info. Here is a great paper on torsion of beams. The clear winner is closed shapes, tubes, of all shapes: circular, rectangular. https://www.slideshare.net/edwinrami...-torsion-guide
I'm in the process of beefing up my aluminum extrusion CNC to be a dual-purpose wood/metal machine and have so much to learn. This is a great forum! If any of you would care to view this video and lend some advice, I'd sure appreciate it.
https://youtu.be/2QTZa2Ge9A0
Cheers,
Tyler
-
23-05-2018 #4
Hi Tyler
Welcome to the forum. You may find the picture build menu interesting
http://www.mycncuk.com/threads/10066...s-picture-menu
Note the suggested rules of no replies just to keep that thread clean, but see if there is something there. The posters are regulars here so start a new thread with questions for more info on any of the machines.
Thanks
-
22-11-2018 #5
OK, putting the gantry C of G between the "X" bearings is obviously a good thing. In my waters I feel that trying to get the cutting tool axis as close as possible to the gantry (making the Z-axis assembly as thin as poss.) is also a good thing, any comments on this please? Obviously in terms of leverage it will reduce the twisting moment on the gantry a bit, but if you look at it in terms of purely lateral (cutting) force, then it shouldn't make much difference??
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Similar Threads
-
A Sturdy Steel Framed Machine Design
By Boyan Silyavski in forum Machine Frames & BedsReplies: 0Last Post: 06-11-2013, 05:58 PM -
A concept design for a cnc machine
By madprof1 in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 3Last Post: 07-12-2012, 10:40 PM -
Router design thoughts
By m_c in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 21Last Post: 11-09-2012, 07:06 PM -
FUNdaMENTALS of machine design
By Ross77 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 13-08-2010, 12:58 AM -
Full Machine Design/Display
By Lee Roberts in forum Computer SoftwareReplies: 12Last Post: 29-05-2009, 09:33 PM
Bookmarks