Threaded View
-
17-07-2010 #14
Hi Ross77,
My understanding is like this: the lower the stiffness (I mean more elastic), the lower is the resonance frequency for a given assembly. Rising the resonance frequency over the mechanical frequencies generated by the movements and the spindle makes the assembly less prone to vibrations - that's why everybody is trying to make the machines sturdier for a given mass.
It's true, you can absorb the vibrations with an absorbent material - like rubber, or, in this case, perspex :). It's true, as well, that you can reduce the accelerations (accel & decel) and the feed rate until a given structure will not vibrate - if you are lucky enough to not obtain resonance... but, is this practical?
Now, I am sure that George's machine will work somehow, but in my opinion, the pieces or perspex he has would work much better as material for some nice products after the machine is ready :).
Just my 2p.
Florin
P.S. Absorbing the vibrations in perspex I believe is exactly what's cracking it, and it starts where the micro-fracture points are induced by mechanical processing. It happened to me before...
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Similar Threads
-
CNC Router V1.0 (For Cutting Multiple Materials)
By biketrialsdave in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 272Last Post: 05-08-2017, 03:37 PM -
DTI holders / bases for nonmagnetic materials
By dsc in forum Tool & Tooling TechnologyReplies: 7Last Post: 11-01-2014, 12:56 PM -
NEW MEMBER: Spanish newbie (with a couple of CNC projects for photography)
By ECardenal in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 13Last Post: 09-08-2011, 11:17 PM -
Test cutting materials
By Kai in forum General DiscussionReplies: 6Last Post: 05-12-2010, 10:27 AM -
Z-axis design - help sizing materials please!
By Jonathan in forum Linear & Rotary MotionReplies: 52Last Post: 22-08-2010, 09:10 PM
Bookmarks