. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Quote Originally Posted by Ricardoco View Post
    Thats a cool idea, in fact i wanted to put some axis jog buttons on the front panel as well so maybe i should consider a pic circuit based control panel along with the speed controller, im ok with writing the program i think (ive spent many a wee small hour with my copy of pic basic pro and a 16f877) but im not sure what the input format would be from the speed pickup and the output to the drivers, this is where my knowlege is lacking im afraid.

    and thats not to mention how to do an interface that wont mess up Mach short of having a switch that swapped out all the lines lol. so if we are going down the DIY road im going to need to pick many brains!!!!
    Interfacing is my speciality, ask away....

    pic basic pro... hmmm, ok if you must lol... I'm a C man myself but can program in anything sensible... pic basic is interpreted I think, so not sure if you can get 'real-time' enough to do accurate inter-pulse timing, tho will depend on the PIC clock speed of course.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by irving2008 View Post
    Interfacing is my speciality, ask away....

    pic basic pro... hmmm, ok if you must lol... I'm a C man myself but can program in anything sensible
    Ok C it is if thats what you call it,lol, i will have to dig out all my software now ......

  3. Quote Originally Posted by Ricardoco View Post
    Ok C it is if thats what you call it,lol, i will have to dig out all my software now ......
    Yes, well sadly its not C#, but its still preferable to that basic stuff (reignites 1980's programmers flame wars lol)

  4. #4
    Well Ill start plugging away at some pseudo, while collecting bits, and putting the new bits on this machine. Mind you I could still do what i2i was hinting at and send all the signals to mach and let it sort it all out thus manually contolling the machine by proxy as it were, mind you i still wouldnt know how to give mach the speed information...

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by irving2008 View Post
    (reignites 1980's programmers flame wars lol)
    With the advent of RAD software many people just dont have a desire or mental capacity to write the code in a text editor these days, in fact back in the 80's they didnt have the desire either, and lets face it 'C' is a nice bit of kit but the time to executable can be faster with the other languages, also requiring less brain power, however as you say not much beats 'C' for raw speed of the final application..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Boxford 260VMC as you probably never seen it before!
    By rnr107 in forum Boxford Vertical Mills
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 28-04-2021, 07:57 AM
  2. Boxford 260 VMC
    By shoeswith in forum Boxford Vertical Mills
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-04-2017, 06:20 PM
  3. boxford vmc 300
    By bigred5765 in forum Boxford Vertical Mills
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 22-04-2014, 04:22 PM
  4. Boxford mt2
    By Hellfire in forum Boxford Lathes
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 03-08-2012, 08:46 AM
  5. Boxford 160 TCL
    By Brinner in forum Boxford Lathes
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31-03-2012, 09:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •