. .
Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Right I decided that I had to have a go at aluminium, just couldnt resist the urge!.
    I made up a dxf through autocad for a box drilling jig for some welding test boxes that I make.
    The material is 10mm thick alu and I used a 3/16 end mill, didnt have a 5mm one, I need to build up my cutting tool supplies.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0034.jpg 
Views:	355 
Size:	125.4 KB 
ID:	4557Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0036.jpg 
Views:	353 
Size:	191.3 KB 
ID:	4556Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0035.jpg 
Views:	372 
Size:	188.2 KB 
ID:	4555

    Admittedly I did forget about the top face of the jig, at the moment I am still too used to programming for profile cutting. This would have looked better with a bit of a clean up.


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0037.jpg 
Views:	350 
Size:	170.0 KB 
ID:	4558Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0038.jpg 
Views:	341 
Size:	168.4 KB 
ID:	4559
    The box lid to be drilled and it fits snugly inside the jig.
    All in all I am quite pleased with my first alu job. For using an old cutter and for a first attempt I'm a happy chappy.
    I have also done a bit of video for parts of the cut and hopefully after my little gilrs 5th birthday party this afternoon I might get it loaded up to youtube.


    Regards

    Ian

  2. #2
    Links to some video of the first alu job.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABNmolGdUJ0

    and

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3agFg5x53JY

    Regards

    Ian

  3. #3
    What depth of cut, speed, feed, stepover was that? Looks like you took it very gently. Seems a bit of a random place to choose to cut it within the aluminium sheet, but I guess you had your reasons.

    I see you're very generous with the cutting fluid!

    Finished part looks nice, are there any marks in the corners due to backlash. Were you using G64? I think so, but it's difficult to tell in the videos.

  4. #4
    Jonathan,
    I did take it very easy with that cut. Depth of cut was only 0.5mm, step over was 20% which would be just under 1mm and feed speed was 10mm/sec for that cutter was 10mm/sec. The only cutter I was was not new so I did go slowly with it. The alu also has some hard sections in it so that was why the cutting fluid was generously applied. The starting point was a mistake, I for got to set my dxf to 0,0 in cad and I think cut2d picked that up.
    I have had a look at the program file and cant see any G64 codes in it. Youll need to excuse my ignorance in G codes at the moment, I havent got round to learning them yet!!
    Some photos are attched of the cut edge. Quality looks good for an old cutter.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0039.jpg 
Views:	427 
Size:	240.3 KB 
ID:	4567Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0040.jpg 
Views:	395 
Size:	153.6 KB 
ID:	4565Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0041.jpg 
Views:	436 
Size:	247.4 KB 
ID:	4566

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Web Goblin View Post
    Some photos are attched of the cut edge. Quality looks good for an old cutter.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0039.jpg 
Views:	427 
Size:	240.3 KB 
ID:	4567Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMAG0040.jpg 
Views:	395 
Size:	153.6 KB 
ID:	4565
    Hi Ian,

    Congrats on your first Hot Chip's. . . . . . . (Now the BUT.:lol:)
    I think your single spindle mount is causing chatter/resonance looking at the edges I can see chatter lines.!
    I know you say the cutter was old but that does look more like flex chatter..? Also when cutting it sounded ringy more like a resonate ring not a blunt cutter.

    Too little DOC, too slow spend n feed or more importantly wrong chip load can be just as bad for cutter than too much, esp in sticky Ali. Don't be shy give the cutter some work to do as your going far too conservative. . . .Heat is the enemy so send it away with the chip.!!

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to JAZZCNC For This Useful Post:


  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by JAZZCNC View Post
    I think your single spindle mount is causing chatter/resonance looking at the edges I can see chatter lines.!
    Just what I was thinking - the vertical lines are a bit of a give-away.

    Definately too low feed and stepover - with only 20% stepover you need to feed much faster to attain the same chipload, look up chip thinning. This explains some of it, though it is aimed at making you buy the program...

    http://www.cnccookbook.com/GWCalcFeedsSpeeds.htm

    Quote Originally Posted by Web Goblin View Post
    The alu also has some hard sections in it so that was why the cutting fluid was generously applied.
    I was joking when I said that was generous!

    Quote Originally Posted by Web Goblin View Post
    I have had a look at the program file and cant see any G64 codes in it.
    Mach3 may have defaulted to it anyway, it depends.
    G64 puts mach3 in constant velocity mode, so that within reason the feedrate remains constant. This means that external corners will become slightly rounded - more if the acceleration is very low.
    G61 puts mach3 in exact stop mode, so it stops once it has got to the point specified by each line of code, then continues. This makes the motion very 'jerky', though depending on the situation it will make the final part more accurate.

    Using constant velocity makes the motion a lot smoother, and a constant feedrate is clearly faster overall and kinder on the cutter. To try it just type G64 at the begining of the program. You'll notice the most difference when a program uses lots of small lines to approximate a curve.
    Last edited by Jonathan; 19-09-2011 at 03:30 PM.

  8. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
    G61 puts mach3 in exact stop mode, so it stops once it has got to the point specified by each line of code, then continues. This makes the motion very 'jerky', though depending on the situation it will make the final part more accurate.
    Ye Try G61 with an high feed rate/accelleration and watch it turn into a "Darlick on Whiz" as it try's to break dance thru the workshop wall after it's destroyed all in it's path. . .:rofl:

  9. #8
    what would you look for or what would it look like . for backlash??

    James

  10. #9
    James,
    backlash would look like an uneven cut. The finish edge at the corners would be like a wavey line. This happens when there is play in the mechanics of the machine like a set of cogs not meshing together correctly so that when your turn one cog it moves slighlty before the other one moves. In a profiling machine that drives atart to wobble a bit at a change of direction until the machine sort of balances itself out.
    t I have found that the best way the check for backlash is to run your machine at a 45 degree cut so that both x and y axis are travelling at the same time ie cut a square but rotate it to 45 degrees on the bed. The corners should be nice a smooth without any wobble in the cut surface. Cutting at 45 also tells if your speeds are the same in both axis at the same time. If they are not you would have an uneven cut surface all the way along the cut.

    Ian

  11. #10
    Whether or not you get a wavy line/arc depends on the direction of cut (climb/conventional), the cutting force and the friction of the slides. Either way you will get a 'blip' on the corners, or wherever any axis changes direction. Here's an example:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC08512 (Medium).JPG 
Views:	413 
Size:	70.3 KB 
ID:	4569
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC08514 (Medium).JPG 
Views:	438 
Size:	65.4 KB 
ID:	4570

    The corners should be smooth, but as you can see each corner has a line/offset portion where the axis changed direction. For that part it doesn't really matter - it's still shiny

    That was on my milling machine which currently has more than it's fair share of backlash.

    This part was made on my router which has very little backlash, so the corners are smooth with no 'blips':

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSC08508 (Large).JPG 
Views:	416 
Size:	87.4 KB 
ID:	4579
    Last edited by Jonathan; 19-09-2011 at 12:12 PM.

Page 9 of 15 FirstFirst ... 7891011 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BUILD LOG: It's begun....
    By Washout in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 158
    Last Post: 07-06-2015, 10:03 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •