. .

Thread: The New Machine

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by fragger6662000 View Post
    No you don't get more torque, stepper motor produce most torque when stalled, as you increase the rpm the torque drops.

    I know well know manufactures of encoder scale that produce an 8um pitch and you have all the american stuff.

    When i built my first cnc'd x1 i was using a imperial z screw, you never need to know the interger apart from the time you enter it into the control software.

    By using pulleys you get
    -another source of backlash
    -drive flex(belt stretch)
    -reduced top speed
    -side load on the screw
    +ratio change
    +allignment flexabilty

    i tried belts on a lathe, big disapointment. now directly driven.

    if we are quoting "you can lead a horse to water but cannot make it drink" I personally think your logic is flawed, if you want an additonal challenge that is far enough.

    As for i am old school i like to watch it, the x1 had a rapid of 400mm/min and it got very old very quickly and that was a smaller machine.


    I actually felt like you were telling me off then....

    Well i will consider myself told shall I....:cry:

    Usually people dont have to be so blunt to get the point across, Im not so stuck in my ways that im not open to suggestion, On a recent project I took a lot of advice from the members of this forum and put it into practice, that is why i participate in forums.

    I dont really want to just copy you or hoss, but neither do i want to re-invent the wheel.

    thats why i dont just guess at this, I've looked at several sources of information and am still looking, here is just one source.

    http://www.arrickrobotics.com/pr23.html

    I dont disagree with all you say, and there are sacrifices to be made using pulleys however my 260 is not direct drive, it is very accurate, as much as i need anyhow, and i really dont want the steppers hanging of the end of the axis (not sure what you would call a group of axis lol), so do you have any other suggestions?

    Thanks in advance for your input.
    Always bear in mind that your own resolution to succeed is more important than any other - Abe Lincoln

  2. #2
    I forgot to mention the other big advantage of belts which is that they greatly reduce resonance problems.

    The site you linked to has mentioned what I did:

    'Even though the output speed is reduced by the reduction ratio, some systems will actually have their overall speed performance increased due to better use of the motor's torque curve.'

    I wouldn't hesitate to use belts again - I will when I convert my lathe, though admittedly that's partly because it'll have a rotating ballnut.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 18-09-2013, 05:28 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •