. .

Thread: calibration

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by JAZZCNC View Post
    I ALWAYS use the Mach wizzard because it works of the actual movement travelled
    No, you measure the distance travelled. But we can't ever measure it with zero tolerance, so it will always be slightly out. For most people that doesn't matter, but that doesn't make it all-right in my opinion.

    Quote Originally Posted by JAZZCNC View Post
    I think it's because the pulley diameters are not exactly to spec and therefore the ratio is different.
    Definitely not true. The only way the diameters could be different is if the number of teeth is different. If you look at the tolerances for the pulleys it's not possible for such a large error. Also having made several pulleys it's obvious that if you get the diameter out by the smallest amount the belt simply doesn't mesh with the pulley, so if the diameter was wrong the pulley wouldn't work.

    James did you count both pulleys on Y and Z? It just seems too big a co-incidence that the number is so very close to making it 28T.

  2. #2
    Ok "Boy wonder" your the "Man" for calc's All I know is how to make it work correct.! :dance:

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Calibration issues, advice needed
    By Kernow Jim in forum Motor Drivers & Controllers
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 23-01-2014, 07:18 PM
  2. Problem with calibration
    By m.marino in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22-04-2010, 04:19 PM
  3. Chronoscope Calibration Tool
    By Robin Hewitt in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 29-11-2008, 01:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •