Thread: King Midas mill conversion
Hybrid View
-
13-03-2012 #1
In most conversions of machines of this size that i have been involved with the ballnut between the X and Y needed to be the FSI of DFI type that has two fixing holes either side of the flange and 2mm lower profile than the standard FSU type.
This will get over you space problem.Visit Us: www.automationshop.co.uk
-
14-03-2012 #2
Thanks Gary - Please do you know the "height" of the lower-profile ballnut, for a 16mm diameter screw (1605)?
- Have used 40mm in my calculations, thinking might have by coincidence already used a lower profile version(?)
- If one could get 2mm lower than 40mm, then it would be great yes.
With a bit of help from Robin, latest draft -version for X -screw is here:
Total length of screw now is 871mm. (it has grown an extra 290mm from the original plan).
Hope that "custom" screw would not break the bank. (don't know how much extra cost that machining will add on top).
- Have prepared to go "conventional" cuttings, too, if it becomes really dear.
- One facet: want to get the screws as good as possible
- Another facet: being a newbie at this, would be very, very surprised if one gets it right first time round. Not sure how much point there is in paying top money for ballscrews, only to want something else next month. Of course trying very hard to get it right first time, but have to be realistic.
Slowly forward..
-
14-03-2012 #3
Lots of drawings on Gary's site:
http://www.zappautomation.co.uk/ball...2cf54c2f87cf0d
I can machine the ballscrew as you've drawn it for £15 plus postage.
-
15-03-2012 #4
Wow, cool Jonathan. Can't go wrong with that. Thanks!
Robin, yes please, need those.
Made another draft of X-axis screw. Please is this any good now?
- added a thread to the other end. And also a similar "structure, a fixed mount" for the ballscrew. So there are now two such mounts, one at either end of the screw.
- there are two (2) screws in picture below, but it is the same one single screw.
-- The other one just highlights, what components would fit, and where. Like hand-wheel, pulley, shims, Belleville washers.
Not sure about the dynamics, kind of figured out, that with this setup, the Belleville -washers + half nuts at either end of the screw ---> would tension the screw sort of around either end fixed mounts. Please correct if you think one has mis-understood the principle.
Gary, the 34mm height ballnut gets me off the hook. Thanks for pointing out these alternatives. Will speak to you about other components.
Thanks!
-
15-03-2012 #5
Robin - thank's for confirming that about the washers. I'll order some 'lighter' ones (http://www.leespring.com/uk_product_...ype=W&subType=)
:) Discuss details when the design's ready.
To put the screw in tension you don't want to have pairs of angular contact bearings at both ends, as that fixes both. You need a pair of angular contact bearings at one end, and a standard deep groove bearing plus Belleville washers and thrust bearing at the other end to provide contact force for the tension. If both ends were fixed rigidly with angular contact bearings the tension in the screw would depend on the relative spacing of the bearing blocks and the length of the screw between them, so there's no way to set it.
By 'standard washer' I assume you mean an accurately machined washer with parallel faces. You don't need a washer between the ballscrew end and angular contact bearing as the bearing is most accurate resting on the machined shoulder on the screw.
-
16-03-2012 #6
That looks horrible. I'm obviously not explaining this at all well.
To put the screw in tension you just need one angular contact bearing at either end. The Bellevilles try to stretch the entire screw end to end. Adding more bearings just gives you an alignment nightmare. There is hardly any side loading on the screw to worry about, so don't worry. I used one bearing at either end of my overlength X screw and it was fine and dandy.
I used a pair of bearings at the handle end of my Y screw simply because I couldn't fit any bearings at all on the far end.
Not a problem for the X so I put one bearing at either end.
The whole she-bang should be sloppy, right up to the moment you tighten down on the Belleville's.
-
16-03-2012 #7
You are all doing a good job explaining the principles.
- It was me who assumed X and Y -axis ballscrews are put together in similar way.
- Assumed too, that idea is to make it as sturdy/rigid as possible.
- There are some gaps in my knowledge, filling the gaps with assumptions doesn't always work
But it will be good. Will create another drawing of the ballscrews -setup.
Thanks again for comments!
-
16-03-2012 #8
... and only one pair of Belleville washers, you don't want to balance the screw between two springs because that can move.
A few design tips.
I bolted the X screw pulley solid to the inner race. I sprung the sleeve that takes the handle at the other end. This reduced the bearing overhang I couldn't avoid on the Y.
Putting the handle on a sleeve means I can pop the handle off without detensioning the screw. Handy if I want to work on something that overhangs the end of the bed.
I mounted the X motor facing the unlikely way round and extended the screw to get clearance on it. This makes it a lot easier to mount, easier to change the belt and easy to pop a cover over to keep the crut and fingers out.
My X motor mount isn't actually bolted to the machine, it's free to turn. I was going to Loctite it in place but found the 500 lbf screw tension quite sufficient to hold it. I lean on it occasionally, if it ever moves I will know I have lost tension.
-
18-03-2012 #9
Thanks again Robin
Please would this setup make the X-ballscrew dandy? (is this what you mean?)
Sorry if this obvious to some of you. I tried to figure it out, that
- if you now tighten the screws at each end of the X-axis screw ---> the nut(s) will push the Belleville washer ---> the Belleville washer will push the bearing ---> the bearing will push the fixed bearing mount. But because the bearing mount is fixed, then tightening the nut(s) will pull (try to stretch) the screw from either end.
Please correct. (is this getting better or worse? Tell me)
Thanks!
-
18-03-2012 #10
Try this pic for the X screw in tension...
Right hand nut down tight.
Left hand nut tensions the screw.
Personally I'd put the pulley at the other end to reduce the overhang.
I should have drawn the handle fitting bigger than the nut. That way you can put the handle on and off without removing the nut.
Edit: I should also have put the Belleville washers on the other side of the pulley so the pulley grub screw doesn't have to slide. I can redraw it if you want.Last edited by Robin Hewitt; 18-03-2012 at 05:25 PM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
CONVERSION: Sx3 mill conversion
By dazza in forum Conversion Build LogsReplies: 1Last Post: 29-04-2014, 10:23 AM -
NEW MEMBER: Saying hello, about to start a mill conversion.
By irgonomics in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 4Last Post: 28-04-2013, 03:35 PM -
Mill conversion to cnc
By wolsey in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 15-08-2011, 11:07 PM -
NEW MEMBER: Hi From King's Lynn
By dialman in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 1Last Post: 13-10-2010, 09:59 PM -
Help with drill-Mill conversion
By Ross77 in forum Milling Machines, Builds & ConversionsReplies: 134Last Post: 02-04-2010, 10:25 AM
Bookmarks