Confirming PSU spec for steppers.

[Rogue]

Looks like you're after an explanation of why, not what...

I would consider the voltage you get from the common formulas (20*V, 32*L^0.5 etc) to be a 'recommended minimum'. You will get better torque at high speed if you use 70-75V, plus seems a waste to get PM752 drivers if you're only going to run them on 42V.

I think that's it. It's easy to ask for the answer (and I often do) but it's sometimes better to ask for correction as a learning exercise.

I agree about the drivers. It was my understanding that the system could be run with lower voltage, I was trying to establish if doing this would lead to an earthshattering change or just knock a few percentage off the numbers. I would prefer to go for the higher-spec drivers and utilise them as best I can.

Ok the calcs you've done are close and correct in some ways but some of what you read I think you miss understood.? The 752s Manuel and 50-70% was referring to current not voltage. So you still need 57V but only 8-9A current.

Yep I got that bit, though I guess I didn't really make it clear. The reduction to 42V or 48V wasn't because I was applying a percentage reduction, I was just observing that several of the CNC places were offering that size of PSU and if I wanted to buy off the shelf then I was limiting myself to what was on the shelf in the first place!

Without knowing more about pitch and what you want to cut then hard to say best route to take.? .. BUT . If the voltage can provide the speed in combination with your screws to give the feed rates you need to cut what you want then it's not an issue really simple has that.!!

Ahah. Of course, the benchmark against which the performance needs to be measured. I was asking the wrong questions again! Not "will it work" (because the answer can only be "it depends") but "what do I need it to achieve?"

For me it would be "Build own to my exact needs" other wise if speeds/feeds it allows are OK use the 48V@12A and save the money.! Certainly wouldn't buy 2x68V@5a has could easily build for less than price one.!!!

I keep looking at it and thinking "that looks quite straightforward", but then I think about plugging it into the mains and I have a vision of mushroom clouds rising over Derby. Some might say it would be an improvement, of course.

I'm going to end up trying to build this, aren't I? Bugger. Well, most of the components are cheap enough,

[JAZZCNC]

I'm going to end up trying to build this, aren't I? Bugger. Well, most of the components are cheap enough,

Yep probably.?? BUT it is Honestly so easy you'll wonder why you fretted afterwards and if you need a hand holding then just shout.!

[Rogue]

Yep probably.?? BUT it is Honestly so easy you'll wonder why you fretted afterwards and if you need a hand holding then just shout.!

I fret because I'm used to being an expert in my chosen field and here I'm dealing with things that I have absolutely no experience (or confidence) in. I am very good at imagining all the horrible ways things could go tragically wrong, though. Each action taken or order placed commits scarce resources, and every mistake is a painful waste. Otherwise I'd quite happily glue everything to everything else and pump lightning through it to see what would happen

Hand holding? I would rather throw my ideas out and be corrected so that my understanding improves, but I'm sure some handholding creeps in unwittingly. My apologies if it does because that's not what I want to do.

[JAZZCNC]

Hand holding? I would rather throw my ideas out and be corrected so that my understanding improves, but I'm sure some handholding creeps in unwittingly. My apologies if it does because that's not what I want to do.

Yep I understand but Wasn't offering to do it for you just over look and backup.!! An experienced eye watching over never hurts only affirms you've learnt correct.

[Rogue]

So...

...this 500VA 35V-35V transformer would let me connect the two outputs in series to get [email protected]. By the time it has lost a few volts through the additional components (rectifier etc) I would have 68.6V (I think it's 1.6V drop for suitable rectifiers?). This 30V-30V would give me 58.4V - with 57.2V being the minimum rather than the optimal that I had thought it represented - so it would be the bottom line option.

Daft question, is it feasible to knock the output down a bit from a transformer, short of fiddling with the number of turns?

[JAZZCNC]

No the 35V is AC so needs to be rectified which makes it times 1.4 so that would be 35 +35=70 x 1.4= 98Vdc. . .Boom.!!

You need 25V to give 70Vdc.

Yes can fiddle with turns but why would you.? Just buy the appropriate transformer.??

[Rogue]

No the 35V is AC so needs to be rectified which makes it times 1.4 so that would be 35 +35=70 x 1.4= 98Vdc. . .Boom.!!

You need 25V to give 70Vdc.

Yes can fiddle with turns but why would you.? Just buy the appropriate transformer.??

Ahh, yeah that might not be what I'd want then. I was asking about the fiddling because I was wondering, I certainly don't want to fiddle...

[Jonathan]

Ahh, yeah that might not be what I'd want then. I was asking about the fiddling because I was wondering, I certainly don't want to fiddle...

You can wind a few extra turns on, or vice versa, then add the appropriate insulation. It's a crude but successful way of tweaking the voltage of a toroidal transformer that's not quite what you want...it shouldn't be needed here though as you can just buy the right one.

[Rogue]

Ahh hold on, wait a second. It would be 25V if the outputs were connected in series (thereby doubling the V while maintaining the A), so 25+25*[email protected]. If a transformer with 50V-50V 625A had the outputs wired in parallel, would this give 50V*1.4=70 @ 625+625 / 70= 17.8A?

[JAZZCNC]

Yes 50v wired parallel is double the amps but they are half the rating of the 25V so workout the same.