. .

Thread: Tiddy CNC.

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by TonyD View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Diddy_CNC_Frame_Design_Bed_Frame_Verson 1.0.jpg 
Views:	3812 
Size:	20.8 KB 
ID:	10215Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Diddy_CNC_Frame_Design_End_View_Verson 1.0.jpg 
Views:	3831 
Size:	37.9 KB 
ID:	10216Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Diddy_CNC_Frame_Design_Side_View_Verson 1.0.jpg 
Views:	3797 
Size:	45.5 KB 
ID:	10217Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Diddy_CNC_Frame_Design_Verson 1.0.jpg 
Views:	3822 
Size:	99.3 KB 
ID:	10218Next Steps.

    Hello all. I've made some progress lately. The control system is nearly finished (bar some limit & home switch mounting), and tested on The Z Axis which is just about there. The Y is nearly there, just need to mount the stepper which leads me to the frame. I have looked at many frame's and tried to come up with my own. There were three features I was looking for

    i) I wanted the frame to be robust enough to support cutting aluminium
    ii) I wanted to be extend the rails over one end for over sized jobs (thanks jazz)
    iii) Thinking of the over size issue, I wanted the frame to be tall enough that I could mill out the lock on a door.

    The machine will be inside so I'm looking for welded frame sides with bolted cross members. I also decided I didnt want the hassle of a moveable bed, frankly I want to get the thing built (this year), so left 110mm of Z travel from the tip of the spindle, I think thats enough for general use? I also decided at this stage to have two rails (in orange) welded to the sides as support for the drop-in welded bed frame (purple). With the exception of the top rails, everything else is 50x50x3. I havent costed it yet, will probabily have to revise on that basis alone but wondered if there was any feedback on the design so far. Thanks.
    Hi Tony,

    I am currently doing my first real build so take my word with a grain of salt but i spend a lot of time considering, redesigning, calculating and so on...

    So looking at your idea i could not help but share my thoughts, even if they are quite influenced of my current design. I hope it helps though. Sorry, i dont mean to hijack your thread

    What i don't like at your idea is that the diagonals actually don't reinforce the profile where the rails are.

    I went on my design from 60x60x4 to 100x100x3 as i was faced by the same problem as you, great lengths and a lot of cutting and soldering.

    So here i just twisted a bit my design to accommodate it to your measures and needs. Much less rails, much stronger, much simpler to execute and cheaper, as much less weight. I would like to hear what others say but i am quite sure is strong enough for routing aluminum, not scratching.

    All in all there are 17.8 meters of 100x100x3 x 9kg per meter = 162 kg

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cnc 100x100x3   profile table.jpg 
Views:	3970 
Size:	205.0 KB 
ID:	10228

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cnc 100x100x3   profile table 2.jpg 
Views:	3753 
Size:	214.5 KB 
ID:	10229


    My thoughts about bead and gantry:

    I made my gantry design to be from 2 pieces of 100x100x3 soldered together, just to have in mind when considering the following.

    For me to build a machine and later to upgrade it is not OK, i mean what you say for your Z depth. Please take a look below for my solution to this.
    My Z plate is 500mm long. My useful Z travel is 200mm, but i will limit it to 180mm. However the idea is the bead to be deep but over it to have a cheap wooden structure 100mm high to serve as a removable table. So now the working area is raised and there the aluminum or normal jobs will be cut. The table can be made from a couple of MDF sheets glued together or whatever scrap. Even from ribbed inside wooden structure to weight less and easy removal.

    So with everything soldered i would have quite versatile machine/ in fact its not for me the machine/ .


    Of course you can add 2 x 1600mm rails and make the bed removable, but i don't see a reason for it as you can remove the wood bed instead and keep everything much stronger. I believe on my design there is no need to add anything or change anything, as even it looks simple is thought to withstand forces from all directions. The only thing that comes to my mind that can be bettered is to place everything at asymmetrical distances to avoid frame vibrations further

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	cnc 100x100x3   distances.jpg 
Views:	3904 
Size:	202.0 KB 
ID:	10230

    If you use Sketchup i will be happy to send you the file with the table i draw with your dimensions so you can play with it.

    I hope that will give you some ideas .

    PS. One key part of that design that i forgot to mention is that there are plates that fix the rails supporting beams. I will lasercut them, but they can easyly be fashioned from something else. They play the role of not permitting to the beams to vibrate left right, looked from front and also seal the profile end.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	plates.jpg 
Views:	3754 
Size:	179.1 KB 
ID:	10234
    Last edited by Boyan Silyavski; 25-09-2013 at 09:42 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •