Threaded View
-
20-05-2013 #2
I think the difficulty with your idea lies with achieving sufficient accuracy on both axes, but particularly Z, to be able to mount the linear bearings. Normally people orientate the joints on Y such that at least one pair of bearings can be adjusted relative to the other, so assuming the rails are parallel that means the bearings will run smoothly. With your proposal, this could be done on Y or Z, but probably not both, which leaves the problem of machining the parts sufficiently accurately so that adjustment is not required. It's manageable if you have a suitable size milling machine, but probably impractical otherwise?
Last edited by Jonathan; 20-05-2013 at 03:05 AM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
WANTED: Supported rail. The bigger the better
By r0bsk1 in forum Items WantedReplies: 0Last Post: 08-07-2013, 07:50 PM -
A concept design for a cnc machine
By madprof1 in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 3Last Post: 07-12-2012, 10:40 PM -
round, supported or profiled rail?
By mocha in forum Rails, Guideways & BearingsReplies: 0Last Post: 26-07-2012, 03:44 PM -
Some thoughts on using supported rail
By Ross77 in forum Rails, Guideways & BearingsReplies: 0Last Post: 29-01-2010, 07:13 PM -
Supported rail or other?
By lateAtNight in forum Rails, Guideways & BearingsReplies: 16Last Post: 14-11-2008, 02:28 PM
Bookmarks