Thread: Wobblycogs CNC Mk2
Hybrid View
-
27-08-2013 #1
I would make the Z front plate just bit narrower than Rear plate and put a full cover over the z axis so it protects rails and everything.
Easy done with 1.5mm Ali sheet, just make a cardboard template and then cut around. Don't need fancy bender or saws just score profile edges with stanley knife, trim with tin snips into straight length then bend to break off.
Easy folded with simple scores on fold lines (back side.!!). The pics below show cover which was folded by hand without clamping to make a permanent template then unfolded, (see pic.). . . If you clamp the sheet on top surface before folding and fold on edge of board then makes a better fold.
Takes about 30mins to make.!!Last edited by JAZZCNC; 27-08-2013 at 07:58 PM.
-
31-08-2013 #2
That looks more like a tank than a cnc machine :-). I bet it effective at keeping the chips out though.
Well, I've been hard at it putting bolts in the design and I think I've got to the point were there's not much point adding any more as they clearly wont clash. So with that done here are some shots of what will get built unless anyone comes up with a show stopper. my estimate for maximum cutting sizes are X: 840mm, Y: 840mm and Z: 125mm assuming a 50mm bit. I cab squeeze a bit more out of Z by moving the spindle up a series of holes.
-
01-09-2013 #3
Is the plan still to mount it vertically?...how is it going to be attached to the wall?
-
01-09-2013 #4
The original plan was to go vertical but the design has grown quite a bit since then to the point where it's not practical to vertically mount it, at least not in my current workshop anyway. When I move to a bigger workshop I might look into mounting it vertically again but to be honest I think what will probably happen is I build a steel base for it and use underneath the machine for storage.
-
01-09-2013 #5
Ah, ok - my next question was going to be how will you level it if its going to be horizontal...but I guess you'd put adjustable feet on the steel frame in that case?
Also - I got my wrist firmly slapped by Jazz for my design with the stepper motor mounted on the Z axis front plate...he said it should be on the Y axis plate instead to help keep it out of the way & reduce the weight on the z axis.
-
01-09-2013 #6
For now I'm going to put feet on what you see as the machine will either be on the floor or a bench somewhere. Once it's in it's final home on a proper frame there will be "something better".
I agree having the stepper on the front of the Z-axis isn't ideal but I don't see it being enough of a problem for me. I moved it from the back plate to the front plate because I had to get power and water to the spindle anyway. Having the stepper on the back plate made getting the cables over more difficult so the front plate seemed like a better choice. As I see it there are a couple of other advantages as well, it's allowed me to lift the z-axis screw up away from the chips a bit and the weight of the stepper will act as a pre-load on that axis.
-
01-09-2013 #7
I thought you'd have your reasons...thought I ought to mention it though ;-)
Looking forward to seeing the actual build!
-
01-09-2013 #8
Nah nah not having that Geeky boy I only suggest or recommend if you choose to do it different then I don't give a toss, it's your loss. . Lol
It's not a problem(my machines like that) just from experience the other way round is better, allows higher accelerations and Velocity and reduces chances of missed steps on Z axis when working hard doing 3D work.
No advantages here in real use only Disadvantages.?
Chips will get in there no matter unless you cover, hence why I fully cover, May not be so pretty but it's the only way to keep chips out properly and increases component life too.
The extra weight of Ballscrew, 2 x bearing mounts, stepper motor, Stepper mount, belts & pulleys makes a considerable difference to the acceleration you can achieve and extra weight will cause missed steps if motors pushed remotely close to it's corner speed.
The extra weight acting has preload is hardly worth the costs in performance and extra stress on motor/drive.
Again not saying it won't work because it does, just works much better other way.!!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)
Similar Threads
-
BUILD LOG: Wobblycogs CNC Mk1
By Wobblycogs in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 91Last Post: 02-01-2013, 07:38 PM




Reply With Quote

Bookmarks