Thread: Quite an Unusual one
Threaded View
-
14-08-2014 #11
Thanks John,
-Yes, we are talking all the time of long axis load. There will be no side forces or if there will be, they will be smaller than say cutting aluminum.
- the dynamic load of the hammer is not big at all, as the head of the hammer will be small, anyway, the hammer can not produce such a force as one can suppose.
-The collinearity will be way under specifications of ball screw or rails manufactures. I can easily make them collinear to something like 0.00mm
Ok, thanks for the input.
The design as its now and i have the elements already at home, implements that the both screws have fixed bearing supports at both end.
So you say there will be no sense to make the design as you suggest with one ball screw, 2 nuts and 2 and 2 fixed bearing supports at both ends? I mean only one fixed end will be enough? The bearings doesn't seem very big to me.
I know about the ball deformation. It doesn't bother me though. The hammer head will be half 10mm diameter circle . The air in the hammer dampens the hit, the material is very stretchy too/1-1.2 mm normalized sheet/ , the whole sheet stretches also, not only at the point of hit. More or less the hit will equal to 1 bearing ball hitting the material. This would be spread to all the bearing balls in 2 ball screw nuts. I am not sure how many are they. means that its not like a hit on hard rigid surface
I was contemplating this belt driven. What i want right now is the following. To finish the machine as faster as possible. To try the hammer thing at least once. to draw conclusions and not break the precision of the machine in that process. To use the machine right away to make a new one, simpler, with homemade ridgid elements, belt driven as you say and most importantly 5-6 axis. I almost have all elements for a new machine, apart of this one.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks