Thread: Quite an Unusual one
Threaded View
-
15-09-2014 #11
Now going cheap was really bad idea. Ok, it would have saved me 100euro on this size of structure...
But here is what happened:
The epoxy poured extremely well. It leveled well. And for 4 hours it was perfect. As gel time was 90min, i thought well, i cheated destiny. But no. After the 4rth hour it shrank in volume and there was not 20mm wide flat area in the center to munt the rail. I did the test 50mm wide channel, instead of the 40mm normal with WS 105+209. Read a lot why and it seems the reason is that the epoxy is low quality and contains non reacting solvents that vaporize when the hardening starts. On the long axis it was straight, so its not a mixing problem, anyways i mix it at least 5 minutes and change the can before pouring, so not my mistake. Repeated twice the test-same result.
So i took a risque and lost. My reasons were not that i am greedy, but the price difference multiplied by the future machines is quite some money. However i just returned the 5_1.6kg epoxy so the loss is about the cost of shipping, the time and 1 lit of epoxy.
Conclusions:
1.Seems the biggest unaccounted problem for that purpose is the shrinkage, in other words the purity of the epoxy. Hence the price of good epoxies :-). Otherwise flatness and surface quality is more a result of good mixing and following exact mixture to the gram and temperature when pouring.
2. Judging epoxies from their technical sheets means nothing. It can seem on paper right but poor in reality
3. Epoxies with very high viscosity >700 cps of mixture maybe contain something that will evaporate later
Left on the picture is WS 105+209 at the time of pouring and cured. Also the spanish epoxy untill 4h. Right is the shrinkage when 8h passed
At the moment of pouring till 4h
The problem after 8h of curing, a bit difficult to be seen but the drawing above shows it better. On the second picture the shrinkage lines can be seen at the reflection distortion . Not that it could not have worked as we are talking about 0.3mm here and on the long axis was straight, but not worth the additional fiddling.
Last edited by Boyan Silyavski; 15-09-2014 at 11:43 AM.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Boyan Silyavski For This Useful Post:
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks