. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    m_c's Avatar
    Lives in East Lothian, United Kingdom. Last Activity: 2 Hours Ago Forum Superstar, has done so much to help others, they deserve a medal. Has a total post count of 2,992. Received thanks 376 times, giving thanks to others 9 times.
    I'd personally still keep the angular contacts, as they're more suitable for adjusting to a tight tolerance, however given the loading, you could probably get away with one single row angular contact that takes the main thrust load coupled to a standard deep groove bearing.

  2. #2
    dsc's Avatar
    Lives in Lincoln, United Kingdom. Last Activity: 17-06-2020 Has been a member for 9-10 years. Has a total post count of 252. Received thanks 1 times, giving thanks to others 11 times.
    As I already paid a few quid for the double row angular contact bearing I will stick with it, but it's good to know 6205s would do reasonably as well.

    Cheers,
    dsc.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Rotating Ballnut - design ideas
    By Jonathan in forum Open Source Designs & Plans
    Replies: 215
    Last Post: 29-01-2024, 09:27 PM
  2. Rotating Ball nut
    By drumsticksplinter in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & Supports
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 12-05-2020, 08:01 PM
  3. Rotating Ballnut Design MK3
    By Jonathan in forum Linear & Rotary Assemblies
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 15-12-2013, 01:35 PM
  4. non-locating / floating bearing - shaft location
    By dsc in forum Linear & Rotary Motion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 28-06-2013, 10:07 PM
  5. Driving floating end (ballscrew)
    By blackburn mark in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & Supports
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 11-09-2010, 11:55 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •