. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Last edited by Lee Roberts; 14-01-2015 at 01:02 AM.
    .Me

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Lee Roberts For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    I like the idea of skimming the top with a router, provided the bottom rail is perfectly flat.

    Same ball trouble here, this was the best video I found, the method worked great.

    Spelling mistakes are not intentional, I only seem to see them some time after I've posted

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to EddyCurrent For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    The grease did the trick ok. 3 circuits, 16 balls ( dia. of 0.1245") in the first two and 17 in the last . it took a couple of trys but i got there. so cheers for the advice and videos links, very informative. the extrusion i used had a slight angle on the broad side and an incline on the narrow side .it played havoc with my assembly so i had to re- machine some supports and change the design of the gantry. i also spent a fair bit of time on the bottom Y rail to get it flat.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to PAULRO For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Latest pics.... i clocked the bed top get it as true as possible . i will still M/C it when i get it powered up . i want to minimize the dust as much as possible. i have 2 nema 23 s , 4 NM for the x axis . i'm not sure if 1 motor would be enough and go with a belt drive for both ballscrews. i have read up on the different opinions here on this forum and on 1 versus 2 motors . the gantry with brackets , cables and spindle come in at 65 KGs .
    i'm going to move on to the electrics next and spec the various drivers, power supplies and other miscellaneous parts that will be required to get this baby up and running
    i would like to start on the electrics next so i'm hoping that someone here will give my nema 23s the thumbs up or down because i don't want to buy drivers for a motor configuration that is inadequate. i have pumped the numbers into Irvings spreadsheet ( what a piece of work , by the way) and they look good . i have read Eddys build a few times and hope to get my electrics as close as possible to his. Eddys ganrty is not as wide as mine and that why i'm curious about the 1 motor versus 2 on the x axis of my build and more to the point should i go with a nema 34 motor? any thoughts on the subject would surely nudge me on.
    my build changed as it went on due to extrusion being extrusion. it all looked great in the CAD model but when i went to assemble it in the designed configuration ( L shape bolting 2 pieces together at 90 degrees) it kicked up and played havoc with the brackets supporting it so i had design around the headache. this in turn lead to a change in the z axis configuration. i have left scope for a revisit to mechanical build but for the time being i want to get it running and discover if it needs a revisit. Paulro
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150129_132439.jpg 
Views:	274 
Size:	218.1 KB 
ID:	14611   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150121_193214.jpg 
Views:	276 
Size:	192.7 KB 
ID:	14612   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150130_153154.jpg 
Views:	331 
Size:	133.5 KB 
ID:	14613   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20150121_162110.jpg 
Views:	318 
Size:	174.6 KB 
ID:	14614  
    Last edited by PAULRO; 05-02-2015 at 11:24 PM.

  8. #5
    more pics .the motor config. is repeated on the far side .
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7550.jpg 
Views:	271 
Size:	191.8 KB 
ID:	14617   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_7552.jpg 
Views:	244 
Size:	207.9 KB 
ID:	14618  
    Last edited by PAULRO; 05-02-2015 at 11:38 PM.

  9. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by PAULRO View Post
    more pics .the motor config. is repeated on the far side .
    Why do you have what looks like a 3:1 ratio on the screws.? Even with a 10mm pitch screw 2:1 is bad idea if your planning on using as wood router.
    2:1 ratio will slow you down to around 5 or 6mtr/min max rapids and for woods you'll want to be cutting at that. 3:1 would be even worse.!!
    Stay with a 1:1 ratio is my advise if your cutting woods.

    Regards the motors then it's preference thing mostly 2 x 3 or 4Nm 23's will easily handle 65Kg. I prefer single motor with belt for accurecy and piece of mind reasons but I'm equaly happy to use slaved motors provided the correct drives and precautions are used. Slaved motors work ok but I would only use them provided you have Digital drives that can detect stalled motors or have fault output so you can E-stop the system.
    Digital drives have made slaved motors much safer in my opion with less stalling as they handle current so much better and can easily detect for stalls. They also dont loose steps as much as the old drives did.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to JAZZCNC For This Useful Post:


  11. #7
    it's a 2:1 ratio. 18 tooth on the motor and 36 on the screw. i read a post in one of the blogs here that 2;1 ratio would be good for detail work but i can change to 1:1 if i could still achieve the required detail. thanks for the advice on the digital drives though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. NEW MEMBER: Hello everyone. Total newbie here. Where do I begin?
    By DarkWalkJRB in forum New Member Introductions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-02-2012, 08:31 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •