-
16-08-2014 #11
Robin,
I think it's worth expanding your reply. I cut my teeth on Z80 Assembler and progressed to PLC Ladder Logic & Statement List, VB, SQL, Crystal Reports, etc. and you've lost me.
Any "Limitations" of Mach3 and G-Code (and I've not found them yet) are far outweighed by the capability provided by an affordable CAD/CAM system coupled with Mach3 -
-
[/URL]
-
[/URL]
-
[/URL]
?????Last edited by magicniner; 16-08-2014 at 01:11 PM.
-
16-08-2014 #12The stamp does this in hot steel -
-
-
It's about 8mm high ;-)Last edited by magicniner; 16-08-2014 at 01:17 PM.
-
16-08-2014 #13
You say "etc." before you say "Visual Studio". Windows is event driven and will never guarantee to return control to you in time to step the motors. The moment you give in and add a separate processor to sort out the timing problems MACH becomes a totally redundant unnecessary burden and you may as well run Win8, check your e-mails and have a Shoot'em'up game running in the background to while away the time while it cuts.
I don't think I want to criticize MACH here too much, look what happened to the bloke in the news today, the one who accepted a Gaza appeal to be published in the Jewish Chronicle.
-
16-08-2014 #14
Last edited by EddyCurrent; 16-08-2014 at 03:09 PM.
Spelling mistakes are not intentional, I only seem to see them some time after I've posted
-
16-08-2014 #15
Windows will not let you take over a timer interrupt, you can hook into a 1kHz system tick but that isn't fast enough. This came to a head when Windows could no longer guarantee to service a serial interrupt in time to stop an over-write with only one level of buffer, they needed 16.
-
16-08-2014 #16
Brilliantly put whilst totally avoiding the perfect opportunity to identify your "personally programmed" alternative where you haven't given up hardware control to Windows. You are signally failing to make a point here.
I'm really intrigued, what system are you using? How much percentage wise and specifically which bits are your own code?
If it turns out that this is an OS bias debate then I'll laugh my socks off as all that really matters is how quick and easy a system is to get running reliably, what the software support is like and what results it produces ;-)
-
16-08-2014 #17
Not sure I understood too much of that. The system I am using is Win7, it is 100% my own code and it certainly does not run reliably
-
26-08-2014 #18
Robin, this DOS based any use ?
http://www.dakeng.com/turbo.htmlSpelling mistakes are not intentional, I only seem to see them some time after I've posted
-
26-08-2014 #19
I'm not Robin, but Turbocnc is my controller of choice. I have been using it since about 2000. I used it for quite a while before I registered it. It is fully functional when you download it. Registration gives you access to the source code so you can make your own changes. It is written in pascal and compilers are available as freeware. Doesn't have a lot of bells and whistles, but it gets the job done and as far as I am concerned, it does it quite well.
Art
AKA Country Bubba
(Older than Dirt)
-
26-08-2014 #20
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Similar Threads
-
"Hacking" and "Modding"
By magicniner in forum General DiscussionReplies: 15Last Post: 07-01-2015, 08:59 PM -
CNC machine "Spanish" model . Advice and opinions needed!
By shapebusters in forum Machine DiscussionReplies: 17Last Post: 12-03-2014, 06:21 AM -
Interesting Article "Makers unite - the revolution will be home-made"
By Fivetide in forum General DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 28-09-2012, 12:06 PM -
"Racks" VS "ball screw"
By C.AlveSilva in forum Linear & Rotary MotionReplies: 1Last Post: 17-04-2012, 11:53 PM -
My apologies to "Andy" for the delay ... internet connection problem
By ali hedi in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 25-12-2010, 06:05 PM
Bookmarks