Hybrid View
-
14-08-2014 #1
Hi Charlie
The gantry side stiffness calculation is for simple routers without raised X axes. It is to help determine whether to use plate, box etc for the sides and what thickness
You have the vastly superior raised X axis design ( which wasn't that popular when I first wrote the sheet) and so isn't relevant for you. Your gantry sides will be fine as they are.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to routercnc For This Useful Post:
-
14-08-2014 #2
Cheers for the help. I suppose it's time to lock down the design and start adding all the fixing points and decide how i'm going to run the timing belt for the X axis.
Thanks again,
Charlie
-
15-08-2014 #3
I would use one belt only, as its easier to align properly. Make sure the idler pulleys not to bend. I would encase them so every steel pin is supported at both sides. Makes one of the idles a tensioner. Find the Gates belts site and there were calculations how to tension the belt using a guitar tuner if you dont have proper device to measure the tension.
Mistakes here will affect the performance, especially the precision. Belt must be tensioned properly, not by feel.Last edited by Boyan Silyavski; 15-08-2014 at 12:42 AM.
-
15-08-2014 #4
I don't care what the spread sheet says or the calculations it will be Mistake to go with the unconventional Z axis you will be creating a tuning fork and this will show in the finished cut guaranteed.!!
Regards the belts then problem with one long belt arranged like this is you can't get enough tension on it with out applying pull on the screws and it becomes unwieldy belt length because you have to make sure the motor pulley as enough teeth engaged and this often means longer belt.
So I'd be more inclined to have 2 short belts going from screws to rotating idler shafts so can get nice tension on screws then longer belt to same shafts on another set of pulleys that you can get good tension on the belt using motor as tensioner. (like doodle in pic) More expense and time but will be better than one long belt.
To be honest it's far easier and stronger for machine to run a brace across back then just one belt can be used. In practice you'll more than likely find you never put any thing on bed that it gets in way off and you can still pass long boards thru.
It would also mean you can lift the ballscrews back up closer to gantry which will stiffen it up slightly and make easier to build.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Design of small router (700x900) for aluminium
By Edward in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 7Last Post: 16-12-2017, 07:34 PM -
BUILD LOG: New Build, Aluminium Frame Router/Mill
By Davek0974 in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 101Last Post: 31-08-2016, 05:28 PM -
BUILD LOG: Steel Frame, Aluminium Hybrid Design Thread
By f1sy in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 0Last Post: 23-02-2016, 10:04 AM -
CNC Frame Design Help
By zhenning in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 9Last Post: 26-12-2015, 05:44 PM -
BUILD LOG: Steel frame cnc router design/build
By CraftyGeek in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 110Last Post: 06-05-2015, 10:00 PM
Bookmarks