. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Horses for courses, belts do have a space saving advantage if tucked away right but it doesn't remove the bulk, only moves it.
    Cost wise it's still comparable on the small Nema 23 sizes with Oldham couplings although if you design the Oldham couplings into the drive train you can also get smaller, less looking like Price Charles and also save money in that you only need a torque disk to buy.

    This is a Taig mill I converted to CNC about 4/5 years ago using belt drive.



    It was done this way because I didn't want to use the flimsy Taig mounts, it could have been more compact if I had reversed the motors but I wasn't worried about space, just wanted a robust mount. Cons of this setup are you are still reliant on the original bearings for thrust / preload unless you re-design them.

    As an aside why when people do direct mount conversions do they hang them out on studs looking like a grandfather clock ? It's got to be the least rigid type of mounting known to man or beast.

    Going direct mount if you put a bit of thought into it you can get a quite compact and rigid design.



    This is the X axis off an X3 CNC conversion, Nema 23 motor but it's the longer triple stack motor, note the mounting which is only 60mm deep, this contains two angular contact preloaded bearings and the Oldham coupling.

    Everything needed is in this mounting block, very rigid, completely sealed and far more compact that the pillar mounting that everyone seems to choose.

    John S.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by John S View Post
    This is the X axis off an X3 CNC conversion, Nema 23 motor but it's the longer triple stack motor, note the mounting which is only 60mm deep, this contains two angular contact preloaded bearings and the Oldham coupling.
    GREAT REPLY! THanks for taking the time to write that + add photos. Really helpful!

    When you say Angular Contacts - do you remember the spec + angle? I assume that these are for the leadscrews and the house acts not only as a motor mount + coupling guard but also a leadscrew support block with angular bearings, spacers, etc?

    With the couplings ... what method of attach is best ... woodruff, set screw ... etc?
    Same if you were to use belts what would you suggest? as it would have to be considered before the ballscrews are turned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. ACME / Trapezoidal leadscrews
    By ZeroCount in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & Supports
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-03-2020, 09:29 AM
  2. Driving me insane
    By Bush Flyer in forum Motor Drivers & Controllers
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 14-04-2014, 03:55 PM
  3. Restoring old lathes, backlash in leadscrews
    By irving2008 in forum Lathes, Lathe Rebuilding & Conversions
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 08-09-2009, 12:05 AM
  4. Motors and leadscrews
    By Tom in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 29-05-2009, 10:37 PM
  5. Ideas for fitting leadscrews
    By irving2008 in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & Supports
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 11-11-2008, 10:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •