Thread: Accurate Strong Gantry
Hybrid View
-
20-12-2014 #1
Now your getting what I've been trying to tell you for nearly last 2yrs. . .
. . . . It gets even more stupid than just the spindle because half the time these massively over engineeered machines only ever cut wood or foam.!!! CRAZY
This design and the over hang are no problem what so ever.! . . Milling machines and Many large commercial horizontal designs use much much larger overhangs but rest of the machine is built to match.
Like Boyan rightly points out your design is weak where it matters most and not very well thoughtout in other areas. This why I would support and brace the uprights on 2 planes and support the gantry on 2 sides with rails.
The over hanging spindle wouldn't bother me in the slightest with correctly sized and spaced bearings. But if you want the best layout which is slightly more complex and costly then have the Axis which the spindle travels on supported both sides so effectively having a Box in Box arrangement.
Personally like Boyan says don't re-invent the wheel just make it fit your purpose.!!Last edited by JAZZCNC; 20-12-2014 at 11:44 AM.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to JAZZCNC For This Useful Post:
-
20-12-2014 #2
Well to be fair the first post did say 1000N cutting force so guessing big cutters will be used and with 0.05mm accuracy that's not much error budget within the whole machine.
Without getting in to complex design calcs the quickest and most economical solution is to over engineer the frame. The extra weight can be benificial and also a problem with regard to acel-decel and dynamic loading but this design stops all the loading being transferred to the x axis like a moving gantry. So wont be as much of a problem.
The natural progression of a diy machine is to upgrade so having a strong sturdy frame means you get bigger steppers or higher powered spindle at a later date.
I know that the machine will be limited by its spindle power and cutter diameter and in fact tool deflection will be the ultimate limiting factor to cutting and feed speeds but this isn't a commercial machine.
I always believe that the machine should be designed from the cutting tool back through the spindle and the rest of the machine. Maybe It would be better to start again with the design spec to confirm what spindle and cutters will be used and go from there. :0)
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Ross77 For This Useful Post:
-
28-12-2014 #3
I have changed the design and want to include the spindle being important( and heavy) part so the parameters:
3 kW motor + belt driven spindle with a later ATC option
Cutters "anything" that the motor can drive ( in plastic I can use 50 mm face mill :)
100-10000 rpm( so conventional machining range)
one option is AC motor +VFD -only the motor is 25 kg I know
other:s cheaper type servo motor or similar- designed for this purpose
I need some help in this subject to choose.
I made some searching but still have not find too much here.
Something I found on Blakburn's post but its reading is not aloud for small children.
So pls point it to if any is here
ThanksLast edited by vargai; 28-12-2014 at 10:44 PM.
-
20-12-2014 #4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Similar Threads
-
BUILD LOG: 8x4 router build. Steel base & Aluminium gantry gantry
By D-man in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 57Last Post: 13-12-2019, 10:43 AM -
BUILD LOG: A sufficiently strong machine
By Jonathan in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 42Last Post: 29-03-2014, 10:40 PM -
Accurate Tape Measure?
By Tenson in forum Tool & Tooling TechnologyReplies: 19Last Post: 26-05-2012, 04:41 PM -
NEW MEMBER: Strong 1212DS - any good?
By MrWiz73 in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 0Last Post: 29-03-2011, 11:13 AM -
Bit OT - accurate timing
By m_c in forum General ElectronicsReplies: 3Last Post: 18-05-2009, 01:16 PM
Bookmarks