Thread: Accurate Strong Gantry
Hybrid View
- 
	07-01-2015 #1
Sorry for late answering. I could have placed this post to a general thread since by going through my one the searching on the good design led the doubt about the primary aim.
Reading the posts after my latest design I recognized or at least felt the generally weak points. Sorry for seeming stubborn. It is not meant to happen. My tenacity is all about my goals and not the way and method to reach it. It is not easy to abandon a main intent and to say right away yes, or no.
So thank you all who involved for your efforts and advice in highlighting my weakness.
I hope I do not have to turn my back on metal and will be able to build a good router for Al and other softer material.Last edited by vargai; 07-01-2015 at 09:41 PM.
 - 
	07-01-2015 #2
Hi, I said that I would not post again on this topic, but your final sentence sounds very sensible. G.
 - 
	08-01-2015 #3
Hi Vargai
Don't be put off building a machine, maybe you should proceed and prove us all wrong :o)
everyone is just trying to help you get the best results.
 - 
	09-01-2015 #4
Of course I do not , because the goal is not to prove that is impossible but to build what is possible:)
Let me ask something I have a doubt about.
I saw your latest general frame design and I am wonder how the steel hollow tube beams bracing react to the machining force on a router .(generally).The seems like "strings" and source of resonance but I have never seen or heard router during operation.
Actually I am wonder of the smallest applicable size ie 50x50x3 showed many times.
 - 
	10-01-2015 #5
It was meant as more of an idea than a finished design. Yes if the bracing became long and slender then it could resonate. They are all different lengths so they would have different resonant frequencies.
It is also the base frame so the bolting down fixings will help with damping.
Like I said it was more of a basic idea, I did quite a few different options and it started getting messy. So look at the bracing for layout and size accordingly.
I plan to build a similar heavy duty fixed gantry mill, better not mention that I want it to cut steel. He he
 - 
	10-01-2015 #6
With a smallish (600x400?) working area and a strong solid fixed gantry machine, I do not see why steel should be
too much of a problem. My machine (converted commercial PCB drill/router) had a steel section right across the middle of the aluminium table that was used to locate dowelled stacked boards for drilling etc. Careless use by the previous owners operatives has led to to both the alluminium and steel parts of the bed covered in holes and grooves all over the place!!! These have maily been cut with sub 1mm cutters, which probably did end up breaking, but not before inflicting serious scars everywhere. With a slower speed spindle, and the right cutter I feel sure that I could cut steel, but would not need to be greedy with regards to feed speed DOC etc. G.
 - 
	10-01-2015 #7
Strong Fixed gantry machine is the correct choice for larger foot print when cutting steel with correct spindle attached. Moving gantrys will cut steel with correct spindle but are less than ideal unless massively built.
My router which in the grand scheme of things is weak compared to even lightest duty milling machine as cut steel on the odd occasion and even cast iron. But it's not really practicle or advisable as it knocks the stuffing out the machine and takes an age to cut due to restrictions on feed and DOC.
The whole reason or point of my objections is that one machine can't cut every material correctly and when comes to steel a moving gantry design is not practical due to the strength needed and all that it brings with it to the build. Far cheaper and easier to build/buy to separate machines each designed for it's purpose.
 - 
	12-01-2015 #8
It was not criticism just gathering data for a steel based light weight moving gantry DIY router that can be used in its scope and additionally I can check , try some solutions. I red about HSM spindle and HSM Al milling and aware of that this is also a wide spectrum so I will be happy with the result that a router can give.
Not forgetting the steel I am planning to attach an easy removable really small, geared spindle driven by the HS one with belt or directly coupled. (EDIT: i see now that the belt not good at this speed) In this method the supposed extension of the original spindle would be only about 60-80 mm and the force not bother the main spindle bearings
With 1:0,5 ratio (12000-to 6000 rpm) and quite enough torque I probably can make a typical steel milling with DIA 4-5 mm mill.
This would be making opening on a flat parts of electrical enclosures ( mainly doors) and mainly Dia 30,5 mm holes for push buttons.
The only problem is that the thickness is 2 mm but I suppose a 3kW spindle can do it with full DOC( the pre drilling- hydraulic method works but too slow and there are other shapes). This will not be bottleneck if I cannot do it just an idea.
pls adjust me if someone has experience.
One question about the steppers:
Normally they do their job and do not care of step loss and go on.
Is there any no too expensive mean, method to persuade them to stop at step loss and not multiply the mistake.
ThanksLast edited by vargai; 13-01-2015 at 08:34 PM.
 - 
	13-01-2015 #9
I've run a stepper based machine for several years and when configured conservatively it will not loose steps under normal conditions. But if you are looking for something else maybe try EasyServo, its steppers that offer some of the features of servos but still easy to set up. Not sure about how the cost compares to the stepper motors you have in mind. They are basically steppers with build in encoders and run closed loop. They will try to correct lost steps and if they can't they would stop and give a fault signal it the error goes over a configurable amount of steps + some other cool features not really possible on other steppers without encoders. They also have a model for 110-220 volt AC so no power supplies required for those.
Nice video made by JazzCNC of how they work
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMZdCcLQc4M
Company that makes them
http://www.leadshine.com/category.aspx?type=products&category=easy-servo-products
I got them but my machine is in the build process so I have no idea how well they will work. I have played with them and its easy to get them running and the configuration software also allows many parameters to be modified if need be.
 - 
	14-01-2015 #10
Belts are not a problem here. HTD belts are rated for these speeds. Problems are the bearings. Conical roller bearings will not spin so fast. Hence the 6000rpm limit on the spindles they sell. You will have to use angular contact bearings, not roller bearings, so they have to be over sized. Though i am still not sure if they don't use ball bearings on the spindles. You will have to check this and find suitable bearings and i don't see why it will not work. I have thought about that many times, despite what i said before. Plus my gantry on the machine i am building is rock solid. Though you have to have tremendously strong Z, cause 60-80 mm are big difference when we are talking about Z travel. On a router i mean.
One thing to note is that when we say -"this is bad, can not be done, not like that, you need other type of machine" , its not that it will not work. It will work.But not consistently, not for a long time. No perfect finish. Not be able to hold consistently precision. Ruining some element with time , /bearings/, etc. I can drive a city car where 4x4 car goes, but for how long? So actually its not a discouragement, its a reality check. I will be more than happy to see it done. Cause i will do it also.
Why don't you sketch your idea for the spindle and investigate the bearings.
As for the motors you could fit cheap encoder to steppers and then feed the signal to the breakout board/you will need available inputs/ . When out of programmed way, the machine could stop so you don't damage material. I have a plugin on my PC that does exactly that. Though that's not a true closed loop. The closed loop motors will push till all is where is meant to be and stop only if they could not overcome the force. If you decide to go this way, i will send you the plugin. There are cheap normal steppers with integrated encoders. though definetely will be mistake for the sake of encoders to buy some steppers witch are not low inductance.
Just use good PSU, good board and motors and you will not need these. Though closed loop would be nice on a metal working machine.
 - 
    
The Following User Says Thank You to Boyan Silyavski For This Useful Post:
 
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
- 
  
BUILD LOG: 8x4 router build. Steel base & Aluminium gantry gantry
By D-man in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 57Last Post: 13-12-2019, 10:43 AM - 
  
BUILD LOG: A sufficiently strong machine
By Jonathan in forum DIY Router Build LogsReplies: 42Last Post: 29-03-2014, 10:40 PM - 
  
Accurate Tape Measure?
By Tenson in forum Tool & Tooling TechnologyReplies: 19Last Post: 26-05-2012, 04:41 PM - 
  
NEW MEMBER: Strong 1212DS - any good?
By MrWiz73 in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 0Last Post: 29-03-2011, 11:13 AM - 
  
Bit OT - accurate timing
By m_c in forum General ElectronicsReplies: 3Last Post: 18-05-2009, 01:16 PM 
                


					
						
		
		

				
				
				
					
  Reply With Quote
						
					
					
						
					
						
					
						

Bookmarks